McNamara v. Patten et al

Filing 88

ORDER granting 87 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Third Request) re Discovery Expert Disclosure Date (Only) 84 Scheduling Order. Expert Disclosure's due on 8/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-02968-GMN-NJK Document 87 Filed 07/01/20 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Christopher M. Ferguson (NY Bar 368517) cferguson@kflaw.com Sharon L. McCarthy (NY Bar 2348639) smccarthy@kflaw.com KOSTELANETZ & FINK, LLP 7 World Trade Center, 34th Floor New York, New York 10007 Tel.: (212) 808-8100 Admitted Pro Hac Vice Jacob L. Fonnesbeck (NV Bar 11961) jfonnesbeck@smithwashburn.com SMITH WASHBURN, LLP 6871 Eastern Avenue, Suite 101 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Tel: (725) 666-8700 Attorneys for Defendants 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 THOMAS W. MCNAMARA, as the CourtAppointed Monitor for AMG Capital Management, LLC; BA Services LLC; Black Creek Capital Corporation; Broadmoor Capital Partners, LLC; Park 269, LLC; C5 Capital LLC; DF Services Corp.; DFTW Consolidated [UC] LLC; Impact BP LLC; Level 5 Apparel LLC; Level 5 Capital Partners LLC; Level 5 Eyewear LLC; Level 5 Motorsports, LLC; Level 5 Scientific LLC; NM Service Corp. (f/k/a/ National Money Service); PSB Services LLC; Real Estate Capital LLC (f/k/a/ Rehab Capital I, LLC); Sentient Technologies; ST Capital LLC; Westfund LLC; Eclipse Renewables Holdings LLC; Scott Tucker Declaration of Trust, dated February 20, 2015; West Race Cars, LLC; and Level 5 Management LLC; and their successors, assigns, affiliates, and subsidiaries, 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, v. GARY PATTEN, an individual; PANO ADVISORS, INC., a Nevada corporation; DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, Defendants. Case No. 2:17-cv-02968-GMN-NJK STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND THE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER (Third Request – Expert Disclosure Date Only) Assigned to: Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro Case 2:17-cv-02968-GMN-NJK Document 87 Filed 07/01/20 Page 2 of 3 1 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 26-4, Plaintiff 2 Thomas W. McNamara, in his capacity as the Court-appointed Monitor in Federal Trade 3 Commission v. AMG Services, Inc., et al., District of Nevada, Case No. 2:12-cv-00536-GMN- 4 VCF, and Defendants Gary Patten and Pano Advisors, Inc., jointly stipulate, subject to the 5 Court’s approval, to extend the expert disclosure deadline dates in the Court’s current 6 Scheduling Order (D.E. No. 84) to August 28, 2020 in light of the unusual circumstances 7 caused by COVID-19. Good cause exists to approve this stipulation, as explained below. 8 The expert disclosure deadline is currently scheduled for July 22, 2020. While the 9 parties have twice requested that the Court amend the scheduling order in response to the case’s 10 unique procedural posture (whereby an earlier dismissal was later vacated) and again during the 11 initial phase of the COVID-19 national emergency, the current request is limited to the expert 12 disclosure deadline. The proposed expert disclosure deadline extension will not affect the 13 other current scheduled deadlines, including those for dispositive motions. This stipulation 14 is timely in the sense that it will not be within 21 days of the current expert disclosure deadline. 15 See LR 26-4. The parties have been working diligently to complete fact discovery in this matter. The 16 17 parties are currently in the process of taking depositions and have exchanged thousands of 18 pages of documents. The parties expect fact discovery to conclude with the existing deadline. 19 Originally, the parties requested a discovery schedule that tied the deadline for expert 20 disclosures to the end of fact discovery, with the expectation that depositions and document 21 exchanges would be finished well before the fact discovery deadline. However, due to COVID- 22 19 related difficulties and hurdles, the exchange of information and document has been slower 23 than originally anticipated. Accordingly, the parties agreed to seek an extension of the current 24 expert disclosure deadline to August 28, 2020. The parties believe that the requested extension 25 is needed to allow the attorneys time to review materials exchanged in fact discovery, provide 26 the anticipated experts with sufficient time to analyze the exchanged information, and to render 27 their opinions in their expert reports. 28 // 1 Case 2:17-cv-02968-GMN-NJK Document 87 Filed 07/01/20 Page 3 of 3 Proposed Schedule for Completing Expert Disclosures 1 The parties seek to amend the Scheduling Order as follows: 2 3 4 Existing Date 1. Proposed Date July 22, 2020 August 28, 2020 Expert disclosures 5 CONCLUSION 6 For the above-stated reasons, the parties respectfully request that this Court enter an 7 Order granting this Stipulation to Amend the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order to reflect 8 the above proposed expert disclosure deadline. 9 10 Dated: July 1, 2020 Dated: July 1, 2020 MCNAMARA SMITH LLP KOSTELANETZ & FINK, LLP /s/ Andrew M. Greene Andrew M. Greene (Pro Hac Vice) Edward Chang (NV 11783) Logan D. Smith (Pro Hac Vice) 655 West Broadway, Suite 1680 San Diego, California 92101 Tel.: 619-269-0400 Fax: 619-269-0401 /s/ Christopher M. Ferguson Sharon L. McCarthy (Pro Hac Vice) Christopher M. Ferguson (Pro Hac Vice) Kostelanetz & Fink, LLP 7 World Trade Center, 34th Floor New York, NY 10007 Tel.: 212-808-8100 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Jacob L. Fonnesbeck SMITH WASHBURN, LLP 6871 Eastern Avenue, Suite 101 Las Vegas, NV 89119 Tel: 725-666-8700 Michael F. Lynch (NV 8555) LYNCH LAW PRACTICE, PLLC 3613 S. Eastern Ave. Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Tel.: 702-684-6000 Fax: 702-543-3279 Attorneys for Defendants Gary Patten and Pano Advisors, Inc. Attorneys for Court-Appointed Monitor, Thomas W. McNamara 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED: 24 25 NANCY J. KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 DATED: 28 2 July 2, 2020

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?