McNamara v. Selling Source, LLC et al

Filing 79

ORDER Granting 78 Joint Motion to Stay Discovery pending the ruling on Defendants' 53 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' 62 Motion to Stay Discovery and 76 Motion for a Status Conference are Denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9

Ballard Spahr LLP
655 West Broadway, Suite 1600
San Diego, California 92101-8494

10
11 THOMAS W. MCNAMARA, as the CourtAppointed Monitor for AMG Capital Management,
12 LLC; BA Services LLC; Black Creek Capital
Corporation; Broadmoor Capital Partners, LLC;
13 Park 269, LLC; C5 Capital LLC; DF Services
Corp.; DFTW Consolidated [UC] LLC; Impact BP
14 LLC; Level 5 Apparel LLC; Level 5 Capital
Partners LLC; Level 5 Eyewear LLC; Level 5
15 Motorsports, LLC; Level 5 Scientific LLC; NM
Service Corp. (f/k/a/ National Money Service); PSB
16 Services LLC; Real Estate Capital LLC (f/k/a/
Rehab Capital I, LLC); Sentient Technologies; ST
17 Capital LLC; Westfund LLC; Eclipse Renewables
Holdings LLC; Scott Tucker Declaration of Trust,
18 dated February 20, 2015; West Race Cars, LLC;
and Level 5 Management LLC; and their
19 successors, assigns, affiliates, and subsidiaries,
Plaintiff,

20
v.
21

SELLING SOURCE, LLC, et al.,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 2:17-cv-02969-GMN-CWH
ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY
AND SCHEDULING ORDER
PENDING RESOLUTION OF
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS

1

Defendants having previously sought a stay of discovery and other deadlines pending a

2 ruling on their motions to dismiss; the Court having recently transferred this case to a new district
3 judge; and Plaintiff no longer opposing a stay; the Court finds good cause for and hereby does
4 enter a stay of discovery and all other court deadlines pending a ruling on Defendants’ previously
5 filed motions to dismiss. The Court finds that the Parties’ requested stay is consistent with the
6 objectives of Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which directs that the Rules shall “be
7 construed and administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every
8 action.” Any remaining Parties will submit a revised proposed discovery and scheduling order for
9 the Court’s consideration within fourteen (14) calendar days after the pending motions to
10 dismiss have been resolved.
11

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that discovery is STAYED pending the court's ruling on

12 defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 53).
13

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motion to stay discovery (ECF No. 62) and

14 the parties' request for a status conference (ECF No. 76) are DENIED as moot.
15
16
17

CARL W. HOFFMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

18
19

DATED:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

December 11, 2018