Sims v. District Attorney Office et al
Filing
6
ORDER that 5 Report and Recommendation is accepted. Plaintiff Jessie Sims' complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
JESSIE L. SIMS,
5
6
7
Case No. 2:17-cv-02996-APG-NJK
Plaintiff,
v.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, et al.,
8
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
(ECF No. 5)
9
10
On January 16, 2018, Magistrate Judge Koppe entered a report and recommendation that I
11
dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Jessie Sims did not file an amended
12
complaint by January 5 as ordered. ECF No. 5. Sims did not file an objection. Thus, I am not
13
obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
14
(requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or
15
specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d
16
1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s
17
findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in
18
original)).
19
20
21
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation (ECF
No. 5) is accepted. Plaintiff Jessie Sims’ complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.
DATED this 2nd day of February, 2018.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?