Eliason v. Clark County et al

Filing 104

ORDER. IT IS SO ORDERED Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 97 is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Stipulation of Dismissal 103 re 97 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Robert Eliason is grant ed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions ECF Nos. 98 , 99 , 100 are DENIED as moot, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/3/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)

Case 2:17-cv-03017-JAD-DJA Document 103 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5

KELLY A. EVANS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7691
[e-mail]
CHAD R. FEARS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6970
[e-mail]
EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT L.L.P.
6720 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Telephone: [phone]

6

JEFFREY F. BARR, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7269
[e-mail]
8 ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200
9 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
7

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

13

ROBERT ELIASON, an individual and in Case No.: 2:17-cv-03017-JAD-DJA
his official capacity as Constable of North
14
Las Vegas Township,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
15
Plaintiff,
AMENDED COMPLAINT [ECF 97]
v.
16
17
18

CLARK COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of Nevada; et al.,

ECF Nos. 98, 99, 100, 103

Defendants.

19

Plaintiff ROBERT ELIASON (“Plaintiff”), Defendant CLARK COUNTY (“County”)

20

and Defendant STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. NEVADA COMMISSION ON PEACE

21

OFFICER STANDARDS & TRAINING (“POST Commission”) (collectively, “the

22

Parties”), hereby stipulate, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), to dismiss

23

Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 97] with prejudice, with each party to

24

bear its own costs and fees.

25

The Parties further stipulate that POST Commission’s pending Motion to Dismiss

26

Amended Complaint [ECF No. 98], POST Commission’s pending Renewed Motion for

27

Summary Judgment [ECF No. 99], and County’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint

28

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:17-cv-03017-JAD-DJA Document 103 Filed 04/28/21 Page 2 of 3

1
2
3
4

[ECF No. 100] (collectively “Pending Motions”) will be considered moot after Plaintiff’s
Amended Complaint has been dismissed with prejudice, and no further consideration of the
Pending Motions is required by this Court.
DATED this 28th day of April, 2021.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

EVANS FEARS & SCHUTTERT| LLP

OLSON, CANNON, GORMLEY,
ANGULO & STOBERSKI

/s/ Chad R. Fears
KELLY A. EVANS, ESQ.
CHAD R. FEARS, ESQ.
6720 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89119
[phone]

/s/ Thomas D. Dillard
.
THOMAS D. DILLARD, JR., ESQ.
9950 W. Cheyenne Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89129
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant Clark County

And

AARON D. FORD,
ATTORNEY GENERAL

ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
/s/ Jeffrey F. Barr
JEFFREY F. BARR, ESQ.
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Eliason

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 97] is hereby
dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that allall Pending Motions are Nos. 98, 99, 100]and do not
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pending motions [ECF considered moot
are DENIED as moot, and ruling by this Court.
require any consideration orthe Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
_________________________________
_____________________________________
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Dated: May 3, 2021
DATED:
_________________

23
24
25

Respectfully submitted by:

26
27
28

/s/ Michael D. Jensen
MICHAEL D. JENSEN, ESQ.
555 Wright Way
Carson City, NV 89711
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant State of Nevada
ex rel. Nevada Commission on Peace
Officers Standards and Training

/s/ Jeffrey F. Barr
Jeffrey F. Barr, Esq.
Page 2 of 2