Deng v. State of Nevada ex rel. Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education et al

Filing 18

ORDER Granting 17 First Stipulation to Extend Discovery. Discovery due by 9/11/2018. Motions due by 10/11/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT P. SPRETNAK
Robert P. Spretnak, Esq. (Bar No. 5135)
8275 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

2
3
4
5

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Elda M. Sidhu, Esq. (Bar No. 7799)
Lynda P. King, Esq. (Bar No. 7047)
4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Box 451085
Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-1085
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
)
HONGHUI DENG,
)
Case No.: 2:17-cv-03019-APG-VCF
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. BOARD OF
)
EXTEND DISCOVERY
REGENTS OF THE NEVADA SYSTEM
)
OF HIGHER EDUCATION, on behalf of the )
(First Request)
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS; )
and KEAH-CHOON TAN, an individual,
)
)
Defendants.
)

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Plaintiff HONGHUI DENG and Defendants STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. BOARD OF

21

REGENTS OF THE NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, on behalf of the

22

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS and KEAH-CHOON TAN, by and through their

23

counsel of record, hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE that the current discovery cutoff date of June

24

13, 2018, be continued for a period of ninety (90) days up to and including September 11, 2018.

25

This is the first extension to the discovery period that has been requested in this matter.

26

1.

DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE:

27
28
T HE

LAW

Plaintiff HONGHUI DENG and Defendants STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. BOARD OF
REGENTS OF THE NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, on behalf of the

OFFICES

OF

R O BE R T P. SP RETN A K
A

PR O FE SSIO N A L

C O R P O R A T IO N

8275 S. EA ST E R N AV E N U E
SU IT E 200
LA S VE G A S , NE V A D A 89123

Page 1 of 5

1

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS and KEAH-CHOON TAN all made their initial

2

disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A) within the time period set forth in the

3

Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 13).

4

Supplement to Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosures on February 28, 2018, and his Second Supplement to

5

Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosures on April 17, 2018.

6

Plaintiff propounded the following written discovery:

7

1.

Plaintiff served his First

Plaintiff’s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant State Of

8

Nevada ex rel. Board Of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education, on behalf of The

9

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, served on March 29, 2018, for which Defendant UNLV has asked

10

for additional time to respond due to the extensive nature of the requests;

11

2.

Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant State Of Nevada ex rel. Board Of

12

Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education, on behalf of The University of Nevada, Las

13

Vegas, served on March 29, 2018, to which Defendant UNLV has responded;

14

3.

Plaintiff’s Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents (Request Nos. 37-

15

46), served on April 2, 2018, for which Defendant UNLV has asked for additional time to respond

16

due to the extensive nature of the requests; and

17

4.

18

Plaintiff’s Third Set of Requests for Production of Documents (Request Nos. 47-54),

which were served on April 15, 2018, and for which the response is not yet due.

19

Defendant propounded the following written discovery:

20

1.

21

served on May 9, 2018;

22

2.

23

3.

25

4.

27

“Defendant UNLV’s First Set of Requests for Production to Plaintiff,” which were

served on May 11, 2018.

28
OFFICES

“Defendant UNLV’s First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff,” which were served on

May 11, 2018; and

26

LAW

“Defendant Keah-Choon Tan’s First Set of Requests for Production to Plaintiff,”

which were served on May 9, 2018;

24

T HE

“Defendant Keah-Choon Tan’s First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff,” which were

The responses to each of above are not yet due and have not yet been served.
OF

R O BE R T P. SP RETN A K
A

PR O FE SSIO N A L

C O R P O R A T IO N

8275 S. EA ST E R N AV E N U E
SU IT E 200
LA S VE G A S , NE V A D A 89123

Page 2 of 5

1

Additionally, Plaintiff served document subpoenae on the following third-party witnesses

2

who were believed to have documents relevant to this case:

3

1.

Dr. Ken Peffers. Dr. Peffers responded on February 28, 2018, and the documents that

4

he produced were, in turn, produced to Defendants as part of Plaintiff’s First Supplement to

5

Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosures.

6

2.

Dr. Bill Kuechler. Dr. Kuechler responded by letter dated April 30, 2018, that he had

7

no documents responsive to the subpoena in his possession, custody or control.

8

2.

9

DISCOVERY YET TO BE COMPLETED:
Once the documents are produced in this matter, Plaintiff intends to take the following

10

depositions:

11

1.

Len Jessup;

12

2.

Brent Hathaway;

13

3.

Defendant Keah-Choon Tan;

14

4.

Nancy Rapaport;

15

5.

G. Stoney Alder; and

16

6.

William Kuechler.

17

Names made be added to, or omitted from, this list, based on the review of the document

18

production. Defendant intends to take the depositions of Plaintiff Honghui Deng, Ken Peffers, and

19

Marcus Rothenberger, and may schedule other depositions depending on the results of those

20

depositions and/or based on the review of document production.

21

3.

REASONS WHY REMAINING DISCOVERY HAS NOT YET BEEN COMPLETED:

22

There are two major reasons why discovery cannot be completed by June 13, 2018, the

23

currently-scheduled discovery cut-off. The parties have been working diligently to complete

24

discovery and, thus far, have been able to resolve any disputes over the scope of discovery and have

25

been cooperative regarding discovery extensions. However, despite this diligence, the initial 180-

26

day discovery has proven to be insufficient.

27
28
T HE

LAW

First, Plaintiff has made extensive document requests that have required a substantial
investment in time by Defendant UNLV to respond, as many of the requests pertain to specific email

OFFICES

OF

R O BE R T P. SP RETN A K
A

PR O FE SSIO N A L

C O R P O R A T IO N

8275 S. EA ST E R N AV E N U E
SU IT E 200
LA S VE G A S , NE V A D A 89123

Page 3 of 5

1

communications and those requests have taken time to respond. Second, Plaintiff Honghui Deng

2

will be out of the country, on a teaching assignment, from May 21, 2018, through the end of July.

3

It is for this reason not only that discovery must be extended, but that it needs to be extended for 90

4

days. Lastly, there is a possibility that certain documents will require certified translation from

5

Chinese (Mandarin) to English.

6

4.

REVISED DISCOVERY PLAN:

7

1.

Discovery Cut-Off Date: September 11, 2018.

8

2.

Dispositive Motions: The date for filing dispositive motions shall be not later than

9

October 11, 2018, 30 days after the discovery cut-off date. In the event that the discovery period

10

is extended from the discovery cut-off date set forth in this Stipulation and Order to Extend

11

Discovery (First Request), the date for filing dispositive motions shall be extended for the same

12

duration, to be not later than 30 days from the subsequent discovery cut-off date.

13

3.

Pretrial Order: The date for filing the joint pretrial order shall be not later than

14

November 13, 2018, 30 days after the date set for filing dispositive motions. In the event that

15

dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the joint pretrial order shall be suspended until 30

16

days after decision on the dispositive motions or until further order of the court.

17

4.

Additional Extensions of the Discovery Period: The last day for the parties to file

18

their Motion and/or Stipulation to Extend Discovery shall be August 21, 2018, twenty (21) days

19

prior to the revised discovery cut-off.

20

5.

Any discovery deadline not extended in accordance with the Revised Discovery Plan

21
22

////

24

////

25

////

26

////

27

////

28
LAW

No. 12), as approved by the Court on July 18, 2017.

23

T HE

set forth above shall remain controlled by the Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF

////

OFFICES

OF

R O BE R T P. SP RETN A K
A

PR O FE SSIO N A L

C O R P O R A T IO N

8275 S. EA ST E R N AV E N U E
SU IT E 200
LA S VE G A S , NE V A D A 89123

Page 4 of 5

1

No trial date has yet been ordered.

2
3

DATED: May 18, 2018.

DATED: May 18, 2018.

4

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT P. SPRETNAK

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS

5

By: /s/ Robert P. Spretnak
Robert P. Spretnak, Esq.

By: /s/ Lynda P. King
Elda M. Sidhu, Esq.
Lynda P. King, Esq.

6
Attorney for Plaintiff
7

Attorneys for Defendants
8275 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123

8

4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Box 451085
Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-1085

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

_______________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14

May 18, 2018

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
T HE

LAW

OFFICES

OF

R O BE R T P. SP RETN A K
A

PR O FE SSIO N A L

C O R P O R A T IO N

8275 S. EA ST E R N AV E N U E
SU IT E 200
LA S VE G A S , NE V A D A 89123

Page 5 of 5