Hogue v. Berryhill
Filing
2
ORDER denying 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Payment of filing fees or AO 239 due 1/18/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DEBORAH HOGUE,
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
v.
)
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
)
ADMINISTRATION,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:17-cv-03107-GMN-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 1)
16
Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket
17
No. 1. In determining whether to permit a plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court evaluates the
18
income and assets to which the plaintiff has access, including those of her spouse. See, e.g., Flores v.
19
Colvin, 2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 93236, at *3-4 (D. Nev. May 22, 2014) (collecting cases). “If the plaintiff
20
is supported by her spouse, and her spouse is financially able to pay the costs of this appeal, it follows that
21
the plaintiff’s own lack of funds will not prevent her from gaining access to the courts.” Monti v. McKeon,
22
600 F. Supp. 112, 114 (D. Conn. 1984). The pending application makes clear that Plaintiff’s spouse’s
23
income of $1342 more than covers their monthly expenses, but the application fails to adequately explain
24
the amount of those monthly expenses and any excess income. Docket No. 1 at 2. Similarly, it is not clear
25
to the Court if the lack of assets identified in the application (including no cash currently on hand) accounts
26
for assets held by the spouse that are accessible to Plaintiff. See id. Accordingly, the application to proceed
27
in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice.
28
1
Any renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis must be made on the long form (AO 239)
2
to ensure that both Plaintiff’s and her spouse’s income, assets, and liabilities are properly considered. Any
3
such application shall be filed by January 18, 2018. Alternatively, Plaintiff may pay the filing fee by
4
January 18, 2018.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: January 4, 2018
7
8
________________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?