Doumani v. Rainmaker Securities et al

Filing 20

ORDER Granting 19 Stipulation to Extend Time. Amy Boyet answer due 6/1/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-03138-RFB-NJK Document 19 Filed 04/02/18 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 James L. Kopecky, Esq. Illinois Bar No. 6225359 (Pro Hac Vice Pending) KOPECKY SCHUMACHER ROSENBURG PC 120 N. LaSalle St., Suite 2000 Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 527-3966 jkopecky@ksrpc.com Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 010532 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 727-1400; FAX (702) 727-1401 chad.butterfield@wilsonelser.com Attorneys for Defendants Rainmaker Securities, LLC, Glen Wayne Anderson,Amy Boyet, Park Lane IBS LLC, and Andrew Kline 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FREDERICK M. DOUMANI, SR., as assignee of EMIL INTERACTIVE GAMES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO: 2:17-cv-03138-RFB-NJK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT RAINMAKER SECURITIES, LLC, an Illinois (First Request) limited liability company; GLEN WAYNE ANDERSON, an Illinois resident; AMY BOYET, a Missouri resident; PARK LANE IBS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; ANDREW KLINE, a California resident; and DOES 1 through 10; ROE CORPORATIONS 11-20, Defendants. Defendant AMY BOYET (“Ms. Boyet”), by and through her attorneys of record, James L. Kopecky, Esq. of KOPECKY SCHUMACHER ROSENBURG PC and Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. of WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP, and Plaintiff FREDERICK M. DOUMANI, SR., as assignee of EMIL INTERACTIVE GAMES, LLC, hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline for Ms. Boyet to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint by 60 days, from the current deadline of April 2, 2018 to June 1, 2018. This stipulation is submitted in compliance with LR IA 6-1. Good cause exists for the requested extension, as the parties are attempting to implement the prior settlement agreement 1279015v.2 Page 1 of 2 Case 2:17-cv-03138-RFB-NJK Document 19 Filed 04/02/18 Page 2 of 2 1 previously referenced by Defendants. See ECF No. 14. Accordingly, the parties agree that the 2 requested extension furthers the interests of this litigation and is not being requested in bad faith or 3 to delay these proceedings unnecessarily. This is the parties’ first request for extension of the 4 deadline. 5 So Stipulated: 6 DATED this 2nd day of April, 2018 7 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 8 9 /s/ Chad C. Butterfield Chad C. Butterfield, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 010532 300 South Fourth Street, 11th Floor Las Vegas, NV 89101 10 11 12 KOPECKY SCHUMACHER ROSENBURG PC James L. Kopecky, Esq. Illinois Bar No. 6225359 Pro Hac Vice Pending) 120 N. LaSalle St., Suite 2000 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Attorneys for Defendants 13 14 15 16 DATED this 2nd day of April, 2018 17 MCDONALD CARANO LLP 18 /s/ Craig A. Newby Craig A. Newby, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8591 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200 Las Vegas, NV 89102 Attorneys for Plaintiff 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this _____ day of April, 2018. 3rd 27 ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States Magistrate Judge 28 1279015v.2 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?