Thomas v. Williams et al

Filing 55

ORDER.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the joint stipulation (ECF No. 54 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to file a third amended petition (ECF No. 52 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at the Clerk of Court detach and file the third amended petition at ECF No. [52-1]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 35 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' mot ion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 53 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is STAYED pending final resolution of petitioners state postconviction habeas petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the grant of a stay is conditioned upon petitioner returning to federal court with a motion to reopen the case within forty-five (45) days of the issuance of the remittitur by the state appellate court, at the conclusion of the state court proceedings on the post conviction habeas petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action, until such time as the court grants a motion to reopen the matter. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/18/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)

Case 2:18-cv-00020-GMN-EJY Document 55 Filed 05/18/22 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

DESHAWN L. THOMAS,

10
11
12

v.

Petitioner,

ORDER

BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al.,
Respondents.

13

This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

14
15

Case No. 2:18-cv-00020-GMN-PAL

2254 by Nevada state prisoner Deshawn L. Thomas. On May 17, 2022, the parties filed

16

a joint stipulation regarding Thomas’ proposed third-amended petition and a stay and

17

abeyance (ECF No. 54). Thomas had recently filed a motion for leave to file a third-

18

amended petition (ECF No. 52). In the stipulation, respondents provide written consent

19
20
21
22
23
24

to the filing of the third-amended petition (ECF No. 54, p. 2). See Fed. R. Civ. P.
15(a)(2) (allowing amendment “with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s
leave”); see also Ramirez v. Cty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1007 (9th Cir.
2015).
The parties also stipulate that a stay pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269

25

(2005), is appropriate so that Thomas can return to state court and litigate two new,

26

unexhausted grounds. The new claims involve allegations that a key State’s witness

27

falsely testified against Thomas and that the State suppressed impeachment evidence

28
1

Case 2:18-cv-00020-GMN-EJY Document 55 Filed 05/18/22 Page 2 of 3

1

with respect to that witness (ECF No. 52-1, pp. 32-35). Thomas asserts that the claims

2

are potentially meritorious and that he is not engaging in intentionally dilatory tactics.

3
4
5
6

Respondents indicate that while they reserve the right to litigate the merits of the new
claims in the future, they agree that a stay is warranted.
Finally, the parties ask the court to dismiss respondents’ pending motion to

7

dismiss without prejudice to respondents’ filing a new motion to dismiss at a later date

8

when the case is reopened. Good cause appearing, the stipulation is granted.

9

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the joint stipulation (ECF No. 54) is

10
11

GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for leave to file a third-

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

amended petition (ECF No. 52) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court detach and file the thirdamended petition at ECF No. 52-1.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 35) is
DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ motion for extension of time to file
a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 53) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is STAYED pending final resolution
of petitioner’s state postconviction habeas petition.

23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Case 2:18-cv-00020-GMN-EJY Document 55 Filed 05/18/22 Page 3 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the grant of a stay is conditioned upon petitioner
returning to federal court with a motion to reopen the case within forty-five (45) days of
the issuance of the remittitur by the state appellate court, at the conclusion of the state
court proceedings on the postconviction habeas petition.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this
action, until such time as the court grants a motion to reopen the matter.

8
9

DATED: 18 May 2022.

10
11
GLORIA M. NAVARRO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3