Burrell v. Warden of High Desert State Prison et al

Filing 5

ORDER granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which the petition was served to answer or otherwise respond to the petition. The Clerk shall file the Petition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Petition to P - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 MARCUS BURRELL, 12 13 14 15 16 Petitioner, Case No. 2:18-cv-00037-JCM-CWH ORDER v. WARDEN, HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al., Respondents. 17 18 Petitioner has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) and a 19 petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court finds that petitioner 20 is unable to pay the filing fee. The court has reviewed the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules 21 Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The court will serve the 22 petition upon respondents for a response. 23 Petitioner has filed a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2). Whenever the court 24 determines that the interests of justice so require, counsel may be appointed to any financially 25 eligible person who is seeking habeas corpus relief. 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). “[T]he district 26 court must evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner 27 to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Weygandt 28 v. Look, 718 F.2d 952 (9th Cir. 1983). There is no constitutional right to counsel in federal 1 1 habeas proceedings. McCleskey v. Zant, 499 U.S. 467, 495 (1991). The factors to consider are 2 not separate from the underlying claims, but are intrinsically enmeshed with them. Weygandt, 3 718 F.2d at 954. The court finds that appointment of counsel is not warranted. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. Petitioner need not pay the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00). IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve upon respondents a 11 copy of the petition and this order. In addition, the clerk shall return to petitioner a copy of the 12 petition. 13 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the 14 date on which the petition was served to answer or otherwise respond to the petition. 15 Respondents shall raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, 16 including untimeliness, lack of exhaustion, and procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss 17 will not be entertained. If respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 18 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then 19 petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a 20 reply. If respondents file a motion, then petitioner will have fourteen (14) days to file a response 21 to the motion, and respondents will have seven (7) days from the date of filing of the response to 22 file a reply. 23 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that, notwithstanding Local Rule LR IC 2-2(g) paper copies 24 of any electronically filed exhibits need not be provided to chambers or to the staff attorney, 25 unless later directed by the Court. 26 DATED: May 29, 2018. 27 ______________________________ JAMES C. MAHAN United States District Judge 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?