Marshall v. Williams et al
Filing
4
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1 Marshall's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; Marshall DOES NOT have to pay the filing fee. The Clerk of Court is directed to DETACH and FILE 1 -1 Marshall's petition.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 2 Marshall's motion for appointment of counsel is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender is provisionally appointed as counsel and has until 2/21/2018, to undertake direct representation of Ma rshall or indicate to the Court its inability to represent him in these proceedings. The Clerk of Court is directed to ADD Attorney General Adam P. Laxalt as counsel for respondents so that they can be electronically served with any papers filed through counsel. The Clerk of Court is also directed to SERVE electronically this order upon respondents by directing a notice of electronic filing to Laxalt. The Clerk of Court is directed to SEND a copy of this order to: (1) Marshall; (2) the Nevada Attorney General; (3) the Federal Public Defender; and (4) the CJA Coordinator for this division. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: CJA - MR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Rodney Marshall,
5
Petitioner
6
Screening Order; Granting IFP Status;
Appointing Counsel
v.
7
2:18-cv-00075-JAD-CWH
Brian Williams, et al.,
[ECF Nos. 1, 2]
8
Respondents
9
10
Pro se petitioner Rodney Marshall is 57 years old and is currently housed at the High
11
Desert State Prison where he serves many sentences totaling more than 60 years to life for two
12
counts of first-degree murder, eight greater-habitual-criminal crimes, and attempted possession of
13
a stolen vehicle.1 He now petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, applies to proceed in forma
14
pauperis, and requests appointed counsel.2
15
I find, based on Marshall’s attached financial certificate, that he is unable to pay the filing
16
fee, so I grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. I also find that it is in the interests of
17
justice to appoint counsel for Mr. Marshall in light of his age, the lengthy sentence, and the
18
complexity of the issues regarding his petition’s timeliness.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Marshall’s application to proceed in forma
19
20
pauperis [ECF No. 1] is GRANTED; Marshall DOES NOT have to pay the filing fee.
21
22
The Clerk of Court is directed to DETACH and FILE Marshall’s petition [ECF No.
1-1].
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Marshall’s motion for appointment of counsel [ECF
24
25
26
27
28
1
Marshall claims that he is serving four 10-years-to-life sentences for robbery and battery with
the intent to commit robbery. But the Nevada Department of Corrections’ Inmate Lookup feature
reveals more. NEVADA DEP’T OF CORRECTIONS (Jan. 19, 2018) http://doc.nv.gov/Inmates/Home/
(inmate search by name Rodney Marshall or by offender ID 81032).
2
ECF Nos. 1-1, 1, 2.
1
No. 2] is GRANTED.
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender is provisionally appointed
3
as counsel and has until February 21, 2018, to undertake direct representation of Marshall
4
or indicate to the Court its inability to represent him in these proceedings. If the Federal
5
Public Defender is unable to represent Marshall, the Court then will appoint alternate counsel.
6
The counsel appointed will represent Marshall in all federal proceedings related to this matter,
7
including any appeals or certiorari proceedings, unless allowed to withdraw. A deadline for the
8
filing of an amended petition or seeking other relief will be set after counsel has entered an
9
appearance. The Court anticipates setting the deadline for approximately 120 days from entry of
10
the formal order of appointment. Any deadline established or any extension thereof will not
11
signify any implied finding of a basis for tolling during the time period established. Marshall at
12
all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal limitation period and
13
timely presenting claims. That is, by setting a deadline to amend the petition or by granting any
14
extension thereof, the Court makes no finding or representation that the petition, any
15
amendments thereto, and any claims contained therein are not subject to dismissal as untimely.3
16
In the event that any time potentially remains in the federal limitation period, Marshall may move
17
to invoke a “two-step” amendment procedure if the limitation period putatively will expire prior
18
to the time that counsel can complete a full investigation.4
19
The Clerk of Court is directed to ADD Attorney General Adam P. Laxalt as counsel
20
for respondents so that they can be electronically served with any papers filed through counsel.
21
The Clerk of Court is also directed to SERVE electronically this order upon respondents by
22
directing a notice of electronic filing to Laxalt.
23
24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ counsel must enter a notice of
appearance by February 12, 2018, but no further response will be required from respondents
25
26
27
28
3
See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013).
See, e.g., Harsh v. Gentry, case no. 2:17-cv-02069-MND-NJK, ECF No. 15 (D. Nev. Nov. 16,
2017).
4
2
1
2
until further order of the Court.
The Clerk of Court is directed to SEND a copy of this order to: (1) Marshall; (2) the
3
Nevada Attorney General; (3) the Federal Public Defender; and (4) the CJA Coordinator
4
for this division. The Clerk of Court is also directed to provide copies of all prior filings to
5
both the Attorney General and the Federal Public Defender in a manner consistent with the
6
Clerk’s current practice, such as regeneration of notices of electronic filing.
7
DATED: January 22, 2018.
8
_______________________________
__________________
_ ____________
U.S. District Judge Jenni A. Dorsey
S. District Judge Jennifer
stric dg en
en
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?