U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Fodor Family Trust
Filing
23
ORDER denying as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER denying as moot 8 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens; ORDER granting 20 Motion to Amend/Correct; Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE
FOR LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION
TRUST,
Plaintiff,
6
vs.
7
8
FODOR FAMILY TRUST,
Defendant.
9
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:18-cv-0077-GMN-GWF
ORDER
10
11
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Amend and Correct the Complaint, (ECF No.
12
20), filed by Plaintiff U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. (“Plaintiff”). For the reasons discussed below, the
13
Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend.
14
I.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff originally filed this lawsuit on January 12, 2018. (Compl., ECF No. 1). On
15
16
May 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend and Correct the Complaint. (ECF No. 20).
17
Defendant did not file a response, and the deadline to do so has passed.
18
II.
DISCUSSION
Local Rule 7-2(d) provides that “[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and
19
20
authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or a motion for
21
attorney’s fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion.” D. Nev. R. 7-2(d). Given
22
Defendant’s failure to file an opposition, the Court grants the Motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-
23
2(d).
24
25
Page 1 of 2
1
III.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and Correct the
2
3
CONCLUSION
Complaint, (ECF No. 20), is GRANTED.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pending Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 7), and
5
the pending Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens, (ECF No. 8), are DENIED without prejudice as
6
moot.
7
8
11
DATED this _____ day of July, 2018.
9
10
11
___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?