Three Rivers Provider Network, Inc. v. Medical Cost Containment Professionals, LLC et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting 23 Stipulation to Stay Discovery; Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00135-JCM-GWF Document 23-1 Filed 04/13/18 Page 1 of 2 STEPHEN K. LEWIS, ESQ. 1 Nevada Bar No. 7064 2 6970 O’Bannon Dr. Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 3 E-mail: slewis@trpnppo.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Three Rivers Provider Network, Inc. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 THREE RIVERS PROVIDER NETWORK, INC., a Nevada corporation, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 MEDICAL COST CONTAINMENT PROFESSIONALS, LLC, a California limited liability company; DANIEL AYALA, an individual; JARRED PIERCE, an individual; FRANK WHELAN, an individual; DOE INDIVIDUALS 1 through 10; and ROE CORPORATIONS 1 through 10, inclusive, 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 2:18-CV-00135-JCM-GWF PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING THE COURT’S ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(2) Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING THE COURT’S ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS Case 2:18-cv-00135-JCM-GWF Document 23-1 Filed 04/13/18 Page 2 of 2 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 2 All discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 3 including the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference, is 4 stayed until the Court issues a ruling/order on Defendants’ Motion 5 to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. 6 7 8 __________________________ Hon. James C. Mahan UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 4-16-2018 DATED: ___________________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING THE COURT’S ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?