Three Rivers Provider Network, Inc. v. Medical Cost Containment Professionals, LLC et al
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Stipulation to Stay Discovery; Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:18-cv-00135-JCM-GWF Document 23-1 Filed 04/13/18 Page 1 of 2
STEPHEN K. LEWIS, ESQ.
1 Nevada Bar No. 7064
2 6970 O’Bannon Dr.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
3 E-mail: slewis@trpnppo.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, Three Rivers Provider Network, Inc.
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
THREE RIVERS PROVIDER NETWORK,
INC., a Nevada corporation,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
MEDICAL COST CONTAINMENT
PROFESSIONALS, LLC, a California
limited liability company; DANIEL
AYALA, an individual; JARRED PIERCE,
an individual; FRANK WHELAN, an
individual; DOE INDIVIDUALS 1 through
10; and ROE CORPORATIONS 1 through
10, inclusive,
12
13
14
15
16
Case No. 2:18-CV-00135-JCM-GWF
PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING
STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY
PENDING THE COURT’S ORDER ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION DISMISS FOR
LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 12(b)(2)
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING THE COURT’S ORDER ON
MOTION TO DISMISS
Case 2:18-cv-00135-JCM-GWF Document 23-1 Filed 04/13/18 Page 2 of 2
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
2
All discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
3
including the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference, is
4
stayed until the Court issues a ruling/order on Defendants’ Motion
5
to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction.
6
7
8
__________________________
Hon. James C. Mahan
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
4-16-2018
DATED: ___________________
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING THE COURT’S ORDER ON
MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?