Reed v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al

Filing 22

ORDER Granting 21 First Stipulation for Extension of Time re Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 12/3/2018. Motions due by 1/2/2019. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/3/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 VERNON A. NELSON, JR., ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 6434 2 MELISSA INGLEBY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 12935 3 THE LAW OFFICE OF VERNON NELSON 9480 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 252 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Tel.: 702-476-2500 5 Fax.: 702-476-2788 vnelson@nelsonlawfirmlv.com 6 mingleby@nelsonlawfirmlv.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Reed 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 Case No.: 2:18-cv-00146-JAD-CWH Plaintiff, 12 v. ATTORNEY AT LAW THE LAW OFFICE OF VERNON NELSON 10 ROBERT REED, 13 CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC. and COMCAST ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC., 14 Defendants. 15 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES [First Request] 16 Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of 17 record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend discovery in the above-captioned case 18 ninety (90) days, up to and including December 4, 2018. In addition, the parties request that the 19 dispositive motions and pretrial order deadlines be extended for an additional ninety (90) days, as 20 outlined herein. In support of this Stipulation and Request, the parties state as follows: 21 A. Discovery Completed to Date. 22 1. Plaintiff filed his Complaint on January 26, 2018. 23 2. Defendant Comcast Enterprise Services, LLC filed its Answer on March 6,2018. 24 3. Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. filed its Answer on March 22, 2018. 25 4. Defendant Comcast Enterprise Services, LLC served its initial disclosure on April 26 13, 2018. 27 5. Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. served its initial disclosure on April 20, 28 1 2018. 2 3 6. Plaintiff Robert Reed served his initial disclosure on May 20, 2018. B. Specific Description of Discovery that Remains to be Completed. 4 1. Completion of written discovery and document productions. 5 2. Depositions of Plaintiff, Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., and Defendant 6 Comcast Enterprise Services, LLC. 7 3. Depositions of any remaining witnesses. 8 C. Reasons Why the Remaining Discovery was not Completed. 9 The parties aver, pursuant to LR6-1, good cause exists for requested extension. The 10 parties have been, and continue to make diligent efforts to settle this matter. The parties 11 agree the current deadlines restrict all parties from potentially settling this matter and 12 conducting the remaining necessary discovery. 13 D. 14 Event Current Deadline Proposed New Deadline 15 Close of Discovery September 4, 2018 December 3, 2018 16 Dispositive Motions October 4, 2018 January 2, 2019 17 Pretrial Order November 5, 2018 February 3, 2019 Proposed Discovery Deadlines. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO STIPULATED THIS 16th day of July, 2018. Dated this 17th day of July, 2018. Dated this 17th day of July, 2018. THE LAW OFFICE OF VERNON NELSON SPRINKEL & FINK /s/ Melissa Ingleby VERNON A. NELSON, JR., ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: 6434 MELISSA INGLEBY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12935 9480 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 252 Las Vegas, NV 89123 Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Reed /s/ Jonathan C. Pattillo LEONARD T. FINK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6296 JONATHAN C. PATTILLO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13929 10655 Park Run Drive, Suite 275 Las Vegas, NV 89144 Attorneys for Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. 27 28 2 1 Dated this 17th day of July, 2018. 2 3 4 5 6 7 CLARK HILL PLLC /s/ Jeremy Thompson JEREMY THOMPSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12503 3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 500 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorney for Defendant Comcast Enterprise Services, LLC 8 ORDER 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: August 3, 2018 __________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 Case No.: 2:18-cv-00146-JAD-CWH 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?