Reed v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 21 First Stipulation for Extension of Time re Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 12/3/2018. Motions due by 1/2/2019. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/3/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1 VERNON A. NELSON, JR., ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 6434
2 MELISSA INGLEBY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 12935
3 THE LAW OFFICE OF VERNON NELSON
9480 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 252
4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Tel.: 702-476-2500
5 Fax.: 702-476-2788
vnelson@nelsonlawfirmlv.com
6 mingleby@nelsonlawfirmlv.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Reed
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
Case No.: 2:18-cv-00146-JAD-CWH
Plaintiff,
12 v.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
THE LAW OFFICE OF VERNON NELSON
10 ROBERT REED,
13 CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC. and
COMCAST ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC.,
14
Defendants.
15
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES
[First Request]
16
Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of
17
record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend discovery in the above-captioned case
18
ninety (90) days, up to and including December 4, 2018. In addition, the parties request that the
19
dispositive motions and pretrial order deadlines be extended for an additional ninety (90) days, as
20
outlined herein. In support of this Stipulation and Request, the parties state as follows:
21
A.
Discovery Completed to Date.
22
1. Plaintiff filed his Complaint on January 26, 2018.
23
2. Defendant Comcast Enterprise Services, LLC filed its Answer on March 6,2018.
24
3. Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. filed its Answer on March 22, 2018.
25
4. Defendant Comcast Enterprise Services, LLC served its initial disclosure on April
26
13, 2018.
27
5. Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. served its initial disclosure on April 20,
28
1
2018.
2
3
6. Plaintiff Robert Reed served his initial disclosure on May 20, 2018.
B.
Specific Description of Discovery that Remains to be Completed.
4
1. Completion of written discovery and document productions.
5
2. Depositions of Plaintiff, Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., and Defendant
6
Comcast Enterprise Services, LLC.
7
3. Depositions of any remaining witnesses.
8
C.
Reasons Why the Remaining Discovery was not Completed.
9
The parties aver, pursuant to LR6-1, good cause exists for requested extension. The
10
parties have been, and continue to make diligent efforts to settle this matter. The parties
11
agree the current deadlines restrict all parties from potentially settling this matter and
12
conducting the remaining necessary discovery.
13
D.
14
Event
Current Deadline
Proposed New Deadline
15
Close of Discovery
September 4, 2018
December 3, 2018
16
Dispositive Motions
October 4, 2018
January 2, 2019
17
Pretrial Order
November 5, 2018
February 3, 2019
Proposed Discovery Deadlines.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO STIPULATED THIS 16th day of July, 2018.
Dated this 17th day of July, 2018.
Dated this 17th day of July, 2018.
THE LAW OFFICE OF VERNON NELSON
SPRINKEL & FINK
/s/ Melissa Ingleby
VERNON A. NELSON, JR., ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 6434
MELISSA INGLEBY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12935
9480 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 252
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Reed
/s/ Jonathan C. Pattillo
LEONARD T. FINK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6296
JONATHAN C. PATTILLO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13929
10655 Park Run Drive, Suite 275
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Attorneys for Defendant Convergent
Outsourcing, Inc.
27
28
2
1
Dated this 17th day of July, 2018.
2
3
4
5
6
7
CLARK HILL PLLC
/s/ Jeremy Thompson
JEREMY THOMPSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12503
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 500
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorney for Defendant Comcast Enterprise
Services, LLC
8
ORDER
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated: August 3, 2018
__________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
Case No.: 2:18-cv-00146-JAD-CWH
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?