Reed v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al

Filing 31

ORDER granting 30 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Case 2:18-cv-00146-JAD-CWH Document 30 Filed 02/04/19 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5

LEONARD T. FINK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6296
SPRINGEL & FINK LLP
10655 Park Run Drive, Suite 275
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant,
CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10
11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16

***
Case No.: 2:18-cv-00146-JAD-CWH

ROBERT REED,

vs.
CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, Inc. and
COMCAST ENTERPRISE SERVICES,
LLC.,

STIPULATION TO AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
DEFENDANT, CONVERGENT
OUTSOURCING, INC.
ECF No. 30

Defendants.

17
18
19

Defendant, CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC. (hereinafter “Convergent”) and Plaintiff,

20

ROBERT REED (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) (hereinafter collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their

21

respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree that this matter should be dismissed with prejudice as to

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
{N0519011;1}

- 1 -

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC. WITH PREJUDICE

Case 2:18-cv-00146-JAD-CWH Document 30 Filed 02/04/19 Page 2 of 3

1
2

Convergent, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). Each party will bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.
DATED this 4th day of February, 2019.

3

THE LAW OFFICE OF VERNON NELSON

4
By:

5
6
7
8
9
10

/s/ Vernon Nelson, Esq.
____________________________________
VERNON NELSON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6434
9480 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 252
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
ROBERT REED

11
12

SPRINGEL & FINK LLP

13

/s/ Leonard T. Fink, Esq.
____________________________________
LEONARD T. FINK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6296
10655 Park Run Drive, Suite 275
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Attorneys for Defendant,
CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC.

By:

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT CONVERGENT
OUTSOURCING, INC.
Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 30] and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
Upon review of the stipulation of the Parties and pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), the above-entitled
ORDERED that THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and
costs. The Clerk with prejudice against Convergent Outsourcing,
action is dismissedof Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Inc., and the Parties will bear their

22
own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this action.
23
___ __ _ _ __
_
IT IS SO _________________________________
ORDERED: _________________
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Do
t Judge Jennifer . Dorsey
udg
r
Dated: February 4 2019
4,
_________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27

DATED: _________________

28
{N0519011;1}

- 2 -

STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC. WITH PREJUDICE