Kemp Sr v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept et al
Filing
12
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 10 Motion to Extend Time to File Service of Process by U.S. Marshal. Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the deadline to accomplish service is extended until 1/4/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
9
10
TERRELL DESHON KEMP, SR.,
v.
Case No. 2:18-cv-00169-RFB-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
(Mot. Ext. Time Serve – ECF No. 10)
Defendants.
11
12
This matter is before the court on pro se Plaintiff Terrell Deshon Kemp, Sr.’s Motion for
13
Extending Time to File Service of Process by U.S. Marshal (ECF No. 10). This Motion is referred
14
to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 1-3 of the Local Rules of
15
Practice.
16
Mr. Kemp was a pretrial detainee in the custody of the Clark County Detention Center
17
when this case was filed. On September 11, 2018 he filed a notice of change of address (ECF No.
18
11) indicating he is currently incarcerated at High Desert State Prison. He received permission to
19
proceed in this action in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Screening Order (ECF No. 7). His current motion
20
asks the court for an extension of 90 days to serve the defendants.
21
Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that a defendant must be served
22
within 90 days. However, Rule 4(m) requires the court to extend the time for service if a plaintiff
23
shows “good cause.” Courts must apply considerable leeway when assessing whether a pro se
24
plaintiff has shown good cause, “especially when that litigant is incarcerated.” McGuckin v. Smith,
25
974 F.2d 1050, 1058 (9th Cir. 1992), overruled on other grounds by WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller,
26
104 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 1997). In cases involving an indigent plaintiff, the U.S. Marshal Service
27
(“USM”) will serve the summons and the complaint upon order of the court. Fed. R. Civ. P.
28
4(c)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). But the plaintiff is still responsible for providing the USM with
1
1
information necessary to locate each defendant to be served. See Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415,
2
1422 (9th Cir. 1994), abrogated on other grounds, Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472 (1995).
3
At the time the motion was filed Mr. Kemp indicated that he would soon be transferred to
4
the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections at High Desert State Prison. He will have
5
no access to the law library for at least 30–40 days after the transition. Thus, he requests an
6
extension to serve the defendants. Plaintiff has shown good cause to extend the time for service,
7
and the court therefore extends the deadline to accomplish service until January 4, 2019. The
8
court will not impose a specific deadline for Plaintiff to provide the USM-285 forms to the USM;
9
however, Plaintiff is advised that the USM must be given at least 14 working days for service.
10
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this Order by serving defendants by January 18, 2019, may result
11
in a recommendation to the district judge that this case or unserved defendant(s) be dismissed
12
without prejudice.
13
For good cause appearing,
14
IT IS ORDERED:
15
1. Plaintiff Terrell Deshon Kemp, Sr.’s Motion for Extending Time to File Service of
16
17
18
Process by U.S. Marshal (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED.
2. Pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the deadline to
accomplish service is extended until January 4, 2019.
19
3. All other instructions stated in the Screening Order (ECF No. 7) remain in effect.
20
4. Plaintiff must comply with this Order by accomplishing service by January 4, 2019,
21
and his failure to complete service by that deadline may result in a recommendation to
22
the district judge that this case or unserved defendant(s) be dismissed without prejudice.
23
Dated this 12th day of September, 2018.
24
25
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?