Kemp Sr v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept et al

Filing 171

ORDER GRANTING IN PART 170 Stipulation to Continue Motions in Limine Deadline. Motions due by 3/29/2024. Responses due by 4/5/2024. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/4/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 4. Since then, counsel for Mr. Kemp has still been unable to reach him, nor has counsel been able to confirm with the Nevada Department of Corrections whether he is still in the hospital. 5. Given the delay in counsel's ability to reach Mr. Kemp, the parties agreed in good faith to extend the motion in limine deadline for two weeks. 5 6. Trial is set for this matter starting May 6, 2024. Calendar call is set for April 9, 2024. 6 7. This request is not made for the purpose of delay. 7 Therefore, the parties request that this Court continue the motion in limine deadline 8 currently set for March 15, 2024, for two weeks days, or up to and including March 29, 2024. 9 10 11 0 s ·; Q) � · "' "'"' f2 ;;o co � ♦u�Clj>l.f'\ � - ���z � � ,;,- � ,..l O Q) i::: Cf) ���� j�>� � a, a, "' DATED this 1st day of March 2024 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. KAEMPFER CROWELL 12 13 14 15 -0 � �j ATED this 1st day of March 2024 16 By: Isl Christian P. Ogata Blakeley E. Griffith, Esq. Christian P. Ogata, Esq. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Plaintiff By: Isl L ssa S. Anderson Lyssa S. Anderson, Esq. Ryan W. Daniels, Esq. 1980 Festival Plaza Dr., Suite 650 Las Vegas, NV 89135 Attorneys for Defendant Officer Hugh Hardy 17 18 ORDER GRANTING IN PART 19 20 Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' stipulation is 21 GRANTED IN PART. The motion in limine deadline is continued to March 29, 2024. Any 22 responses to motions in limine will be due April 5, 2024. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED _______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT WDGE 25 26 DATED: March 4, 2024 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?