Kemp Sr v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept et al
Filing
171
ORDER GRANTING IN PART 170 Stipulation to Continue Motions in Limine Deadline. Motions due by 3/29/2024. Responses due by 4/5/2024. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/4/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
1
2
3
4
4.
Since then, counsel for Mr. Kemp has still been unable to reach him, nor has counsel
been able to confirm with the Nevada Department of Corrections whether he is still in the hospital.
5.
Given the delay in counsel's ability to reach Mr. Kemp, the parties agreed in good
faith to extend the motion in limine deadline for two weeks.
5
6.
Trial is set for this matter starting May 6, 2024. Calendar call is set for April 9, 2024.
6
7.
This request is not made for the purpose of delay.
7
Therefore, the parties request that this Court continue the motion in limine deadline
8
currently set for March 15, 2024, for two weeks days, or up to and including March 29, 2024.
9
10
11
0
s
·;
Q)
�
· "'
"'"'
f2 ;;o
co
� ♦u�Clj>l.f'\
�
-
���z
�
� ,;,-
� ,..l O
Q)
i:::
Cf)
����
j�>�
�
a,
a,
"'
DATED this 1st day of March 2024
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
KAEMPFER CROWELL
12
13
14
15
-0 �
�j
ATED this 1st day of March 2024
16
By: Isl Christian P. Ogata
Blakeley E. Griffith, Esq.
Christian P. Ogata, Esq.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Plaintiff
By: Isl L ssa S. Anderson
Lyssa S. Anderson, Esq.
Ryan W. Daniels, Esq.
1980 Festival Plaza Dr., Suite 650
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Attorneys for Defendant Officer Hugh
Hardy
17
18
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
19
20
Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' stipulation is
21
GRANTED IN PART. The motion in limine deadline is continued to March 29, 2024. Any
22
responses to motions in limine will be due April 5, 2024.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT WDGE
25
26
DATED: March 4, 2024
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?