Wagner v. Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, et al

Filing 50

ORDER that the parties shall have until August 14, 2018, to either file a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice, or a joint status report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00173-APG-PAL Document 49 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6069 South Fort Apache Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 10 11 Michael Kind, Esq. (SBN: 13903) KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6069 South Fort Apache Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Phone: (800) 400-6808 x7 FAX: (800) 520-5523 mkind@kazlg.com David H. Krieger, Esq. (SBN: 9086) HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350 Henderson, Nevada 89123 Phone: (702) 880-5554 FAX: (702) 385-5518 dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com Attorneys for Plaintiff George A. Wagner 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 George A. Wagner, Case No. 2:18-cv-00173-APG-PAL Plaintiff, Joint Status Report Regarding Settlement between Plaintiff and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. v. Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, Universal Payment Corporation, Weststar Credit Union, Equifax Information Services LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STATUS REPORT !1 CASE NO.: 2:18-cv-00173-APG-PAL Case 2:18-cv-00173-APG-PAL Document 49 Filed 07/16/18 Page 2 of 3 JOINT STATUS REPORT 1 2 The dispute between Plaintiff George A. Wagner and Defendant Experian 3 Information Solutions, Inc. (“Defendant” and jointly as the “Parties”) has been 4 resolved. 5 The Parties have agreed as to the settlement terms and have exchanged a 6 final settlement agreement. The Parties are waiting for a fully executed copy of the 7 settlement agreement to be exchanged. The Parties anticipate filing dismissal 8 documents as to Defendant within 30 days—on or before August 14, 2018. 9 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6069 South Fort Apache Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 10 DATED this 16th day of July 2018. 11 12 13 Respectfully Submitted, KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 By: /s/ Michael Kind Michael Kind, Esq. 6069 S. Fort Apache Rd., Ste 100 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Attorneys for Plaintiff NAYLOR & BRASTER By: /s/ Jennifer L. Braster Andrew J. Sharples, Esq. Jennifer L. Braster, Esq. 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
 IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2018. ___________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall have until August 14, 2018, to either file a stipulation 26 to dismiss with prejudice, or a joint status report advising when the stipulation will be filed. 27 28 Dated: July 19, 2018 ___________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STATUS REPORT !2 CASE NO.: 2:18-cv-00173-APG-PAL Case 2:18-cv-00173-APG-PAL Document 49 Filed 07/16/18 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil 3 Procedure that on July 16, 2018, the foregoing Joint Status Report Regarding 4 Settlement was filed and served via CM/ECF to all parties appearing in this case. 5 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6 7 By: /s/ Michael Kind Michael Kind, Esq. 6069 South Fort Apache Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 8 9 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6069 South Fort Apache Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STATUS REPORT CASE NO.: 2:18-cv-00173-APG-PAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?