U.S. Bank National Association v. Southern Highlands Community Association et al

Filing 81

ORDER granting 80 Stipulation TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES (Fourth Request). Discovery due by 8/8/2024. Motions due by 9/9/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/9/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 6/17/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 E-mail: karen@hankslg.com CHANTEL M. SCHIMMING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8886 E-mail: chantel@hankslg.com HANKS LAW GROUP 7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89139 Telephone: (702) 758-8434 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 12 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS Case No. 2:18-cv-00205-GMN-BNW TRUSTEE FOR J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE TRUST 2006-A-7, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND Plaintiff, DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES 13 vs. 14 SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION; and SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, 11 15 16 (Fourth Request) Defendants. 17 18 SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for 19 J.P. Morgan Mortgage Trust 2006-A-7, (“U.S. Bank”) hereby respectfully submit this Stipulation 20 and Order to Extend Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines pursuant to LR 26-4 and LR IA 21 6-1. This is the Parties fourth request for an extension of the deadlines. 22 On June 14, 2024, the parties discussed the necessity to extend the discovery and 23 dispositive motion deadlines. In January 2024, SFR served a subpoena duces tecum on Miles 24 Bauer Bergstrom & Winters. Despite several follow-up emails with Douglas Miles, the Custodian 25 of Records for Miles Bauer Bergstrom & Winters and despite repeated assurances from Mr. Miles 26 that he was working on compiling the documents responsive to the subpoena, by early May 2024, 27 Miles Bauer had still not answered the subpoena duces tecum. As a result, on May 7, 2024, SFR 28 -1- 1 issued requests for production of documents to U.S. Bank which mirrored the requests to Miles 2 Bauer. On June 3, 2024, 21-days before the close of discovery, SFR counsel’s emailed U.S. Bank’s 3 counsel and inquired whether U.S. Bank would be responding to the requests for production of 4 documents which were due on May 6, 2024. U.S. Bank’s counsel indicated yes it would be 5 responding. 6 In anticipation of receiving the responses, on June 3, 2024, SFR’s counsel also emailed 7 Rock Jung to re-schedule his deposition within the discovery period. As indicated in the parties’ 8 prior stipulations, SFR cannot depose Mr. Jung until it receives the documents it requested of Miles 9 Bauer/U.S. Bank. On June 6, 2024, Mr. Jung responded that he was currently working remotely 10 overseas for the summer and was not available any time within the discovery period. On that same 11 date, SFR’s counsel asked when he was arriving back and also indicated the deposition could be 12 taken remotely. To date, Mr. Jung has not responded. On that same date, SFR’s counsel updated 13 U.S. Bank’s counsel about the email exchange. 14 On May 6, 2024, SFR received U.S. Bank’s responses, but believes the responses are not 15 full and complete. As such, on June 14, 2024, SFR’s counsel and U.S. Bank’s counsel conducted 16 a meet and confer wherein U.S Bank agreed to re-look at its production and produce additional 17 documents, although there may be some documents that U.S. Bank objects to providing. U.S 18 Bank’s counsel indicated he will be out of town from June 24 and July 5, so between now and a 19 little after that date, the parties plan to work together on getting the documents requested by SFR. 20 To the extent there are objections to some, SFR and U.S. Bank reserve the right to file any 21 necessary motions. 22 The parties hereby request to extend the discovery deadlines to August 8, 2024, the 23 dispositive motions deadline to September 9, 2024,1 and the Pre-trial Order deadline to October 9, 24 2024. Excusable neglect exists for not filing this stipulation 21-days before the discovery cut-off 25 because on June 3, 2024, (21-days before discovery cut-off) SFR verified it was going to receive 26 responses to the requests for production of documents and believed these responses would be 27 28 1 September 8, 2024 falls on a Sunday. -2- 1 complete and then attempted to re-set Mr. Jung’s deposition within the discovery period based on 2 this understanding. It was not until June 6, 2024 that SFR learned Mr. Jung was not available for 3 deposition and then it was not until June 10, 2024, SFR realized the responses were not complete. 4 On that date, SFR arranged for a meet and confer which took place as soon as practicable. 5 I. DISCOVERY COMPLETED: A. 6 Initial and Supplemental Disclosures: 7 1. On July 18, 2018, SFR served its Initial Disclosures. 8 2. On July 2, 2018, U.S. Bank served its Initial Disclosures. 9 3. On July 27, 2018, U.S. Bank served its Second Supplemental Disclosure. 10 4. On October 18, 2023, U.S. Bank served its Third Supplemental Disclosure. 11 5. On November 28, 2023, U.S. Bank served its Fourth Supplemental Disclosure. 12 6. 13 On December 20, 2023, U.S. Bank served its Fifth Supplemental Disclosure. 14 15 7. On January 19, 2024, U.S. Bank served its Sixth Supplemental Disclosure. 16 8. On January 22, 2024, SFR served its First Post Remand Disclosures. 17 9. On February 6, 2024, SFR served its Second Post Remand Disclosures. 18 10. On March 11, 2024, U.S. Bank served its Seventh Supplemental Disclosures. 19 11. 20 B. 21 Initial and Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: 1. 22 C. 23 On June 14, 2018, U.S. Bank served its Initial Expert Disclosure. Written Discovery: 1. 24 On June 5, 2024, U.S. Bank served its Eighth Supplemental Disclosures. On June 27, 2018, U.S. Bank served its First Sets of Requests for 25 Admission, Interrogatories, and Requests for Production of Documents to 26 SFR. 27 /// 28 -3- 2. 1 On July 25, 2018, SFR served its First Sets of Requests for Admission, Interrogatories, and Requests for Production of Documents to U.S. Bank. 2 3. 3 On January 19, 2024, SFR served its First Post Remand Set of Interrogatories to U.S. Bank. 4 4. 5 On January 19, 2024, U.S. Bank served its First Sets of Post Remand 6 Requests for Admission, Interrogatories, and Requests for Production of 7 Documents to SFR. 5. 8 On May 7, 2024, SFR served its Requests for Production of Documents to U.S. Bank. 9 D. 10 Depositions: 1. 11 Deposition of Diane DeLoney, 30(b)(6) Representative for U.S. Bank, taken on July 6, 2018. 12 2. 13 Deposition of David Alessi, 30(b)(6) Representative for Alessi & Koenig, LLC, taken on August 2, 2018. 14 3. 15 Deposition of David Bembas, 30(b)(6) Representative of SFR, taken on August 14, 2018. 16 17 4. Deposition of Ryan Kerbow, Esq., taken on November 28, 2023. 18 5. Deposition of Jeremy Bergstrom, Esq. scheduled for November 28, 2023 (non-appearance entered). 19 E. 20 Subpoenas: 1. 21 Subpoena Duces Tecum to Custodian of Records for Miles, Bauer, 22 Bergstrom & Winters, LLP. Served on January 25, 2024. Responses were 23 due February 9, 2024. No response was received. 24 II. SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE 25 COMPLETED: 26 A. 27 Written Discovery: 1. Follow-up requests based on the documents produced by U.S. Bank. 28 -4- B. 1 Depositions: 1. 2 SFR’s deposition of Rock Jung to be rescheduled. This deposition cannot 3 be scheduled until SFR receives the documents it is seeking from Miles 4 Bauer. 5 III. REASONS WHY DISCOVERY WAS NOT COMPLETED WITHIN TIME LIMITS 6 SET BY DISCOVERY PLAN: 7 As required by LR 26-3, because this stipulation is being submitted after the twenty-one 8 (21) days before the discovery deadline, the parties must demonstrate excusable neglect. Excusable 9 neglect is present to allow the parties an additional forty-five (45) days to complete the remaining 10 discovery. Specifically, SFR served a subpoena for records to Miles Bauer on January 25, 2024, 11 and although the February 9, 2024, deadline to respond passed without any response from Miles 12 Bauer, SFR kept receiving emails from Doug Miles assuring SFR it he was working on compiling 13 the documents. By early May 2024, still having not received the responses, SFR issued mirror 14 requests to U.S. Bank. On June 3, 2021, the 21-day deadline, SFR asked whether U.S. Bank 15 intended to respond and was told it did. But on June 6, 2024, when SFR received U.S. Bank’s 16 responses, SFR believed the responses were incomplete, and promptly scheduled a meet and confer. 17 During this same time period, SFR learned Mr. Jung is not available for deposition and has not 18 received follow-up communication from Mr. Jung. While motion practice may still be necessary, 19 and SFR and U.S. Bank reserve the right to file any motions they deem necessary, U.S. Bank and 20 SFR are hopeful the issues will be resolved. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, excusable neglect exists for the parties’ 21 22 requested extension of the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. 23 IV. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING ALL REMAINING DISCOVERY: 24 Event Previous Deadline New Deadline 25 Discovery Cut-off Monday, June 24, 2024 Thursday, August 8, 2024 26 Dispositive Motions Wednesday, July 24, 2024 Monday, September 9, 2024 27 Pre-Trial Order Monday, August 26, 2024 Wednesday, October 9, 2024 28 -5- 1 The parties submit this Stipulation and Order in good faith and not for purposes of delay 2 or to prejudice any party. 3 DATED this 14th day of June 2024. DATED this 14th day of June 2024. 4 HANKS LAW GROUP AKERMAN LLP /s/ Karen L. Hanks KAREN L. HANKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9578 7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89139 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC /s/ Scott R. Lachman SCOTT R. LACHMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12016 1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 Attorneys for U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for J.P. Morgan Mortgage Trust 2006-A-7 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ORDER 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 ________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: 6/17/2024 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -6-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?