Whittier v. Ceasars Entertainment Corporation

Filing 12

ORDER Granting 11 Stipulation to Reschedule Early Neutral Evaluation Session. The Early Neutral Evaluation session scheduled for 3/13/18 is VACATED and RESCHEDULED to 4/6/18 at 10:00 AM. The ENE confidential statement is due by 4:00 PM, 3/30/18. All else as stated in 9 the Order setting the ENE remains unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PATRICK H. HICKS, ESQ., Bar # 4632 SANDRA KETNER, ESQ., Bar # 8527 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 300 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937 Telephone: 702.862.8800 Fax No.: 702.862.8811 Email: phicks@littler.com Email: sketner@littler.com Attorneys for Defendant CAESARS ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC (incorrectly named as "CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION") UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 TERRENCE WHITTIER, an individual; 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, dba CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, LAS VEGAS; DOES I-X, ROE CORPORATIONS I-X. 15 16 17 Case No. 2:18-00213-GMN-CWH STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION SESSION [FIRST REQUEST] Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff TERRENCE WHITTIER (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant CAESARS ENTERPRISE 20 SERVICES, LLC (incorrectly named as “CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION” and 21 hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, do hereby stipulate 22 and request that the Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) session currently scheduled for March 13, 23 2018, be rescheduled to a later date for the reasons set forth herein. 24 Counsel for the parties are currently engaged in discussions regarding potential legal 25 deficiencies in the claims asserted in Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1). Counsel believes that such 26 discussions will likely result in Plaintiff filing an amended complaint before Defendant files its 27 responsive pleading. Defendant’s first responsive pleading is not due until March 14, 2018, the day 28 after the currently scheduled ENE. (ECF No. 10). Therefore, the parties will not likely be fully LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 S. Virginia St. 8th Floor Reno, NV 89501 775.348.4888 Firmwide:153052335.1 079206.1009 1 apprised of and have an opportunity to analyze the claims and defenses of the opposing party at the 2 time of the currently scheduled ENE (or the date that the parties’ ENE Statements are due). 3 The parties believe that they will be unable to engage in meaningful settlement discussions if 4 the ENE is held on March 14, 2018. Therefore, the parties request that the ENE be rescheduled for a 5 date after April 5, 2018. If the Court is inclined to reschedule the ENE, the parties suggest that they 6 be ordered to contact chambers to obtain available dates in April for the ENE. This Stipulation is 7 made in good faith and not for purposes of delay. 8 Dated: February 23, 2018 February 23, 2018 9 10 11 12 13 /s/Jenny L. Foley JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ. HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff TERRENCE WHITTIER 14 /s/Sandra Ketner PATRICK H. HICKS, ESQ. SANDRA KETNER, ESQ. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant CAESARS ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC (incorrectly named as “CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION”) 15 16 17 ORDER 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 26th Dated this ______ day of February, 2018. 22 23 24 25 The Early Neutral Evaluation session scheduled for March 13, 2018 is VACATED and RESCHEDULED to April 6, 2018 at 10:00 AM. The ENE confidential statement is due by 4:00 PM, March 30, 2018. All else as stated in the Order setting the ENE (ECF No. 9) remains unchanged. 26 27 28 LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C . ATTORNEYS AT LAW 200 S. Virginia St. 8th Floor Reno, NV 89501 775.348.4888 Firmwide:153052335.1 079206.1009 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?