Curley v. Customer Connexx LLC et al

Filing 124

ORDER on Mandate. IT IS ORDERED that the parties to confer by phone or in person about how to proceed on the issues remanded by the Ninth Circuit. By December 16, 2022, the parties will file either a stipulated plan or alternative proposals. The pla n or proposals should address, at a minimum, whether a trial or evidentiary hearing is needed to resolve the remanded issues and a schedule for briefs and hearings. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/18/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 DANIELLE CURLEY, et al., 4 Plaintiffs Case No.: 2:18-cv-00233-APG-DJA Order on Mandate 5 v. 6 CUSTOMER CONNEXX LLC, et al., 7 8 Defendants The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion reversing the 9 judgment entered in this case. That court also remanded the case to me to consider “whether 10 time spent shutting down computers is compensable, whether the time spent booting up and 11 down the computers is not compensable under the de minimis doctrine, and whether Connexx 12 had no knowledge of the alleged overtime such that it is not in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 207.” 13 ECF No. 121 at 20. The parties are to confer about how to proceed on these issues (e.g., whether 14 a trial or evidentiary hearing is needed to resolve them, a schedule for briefs and hearings, etc.). 15 The parties are to submit either a stipulated plan or alternative proposals. 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that the mandate be spread upon the records of this court. 17 I FURTHER ORDER the parties to confer by phone or in person about how to proceed 18 on the issues remanded by the Ninth Circuit. By December 16, 2022, the parties will file either a 19 stipulated plan or alternative proposals. The plan or proposals should address, at a minimum, 20 whether a trial or evidentiary hearing is needed to resolve the remanded issues and a schedule for 21 briefs and hearings. 22 23 DATED this 18th day of November, 2022. ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?