Peck v. State of Nevada, ex rel et al

Filing 199

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the motion for equal access to HDSP's law library (ECF NO. 194 ) is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to clarify (ECF NO. 195 ) is STRICKEN in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/23/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** FRANK PECK, 4 Plaintiff(s), 2:18-cv-00237-APG-VCF ORDER 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 v. STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. Nevada Department of Correction, et al.; PRISON COMMISSIONERS; GOVERNOR BRIAN SANDOVAL; SECRETARY OF STATE BARBARA CEGAVSKI; ATTORNEY GENERAL ADAM LAXALT; DIRECTOR OF PRISONS JAMES DZURENDA; WARDEN BRIAN WILLIAMS, HDSP; ASSOCIATE WARDEN JENNIFER NASH; ASSOCIATE WARDEN PERRY RUSSELL; ACTING ASSOCIATE WARDEN T. TIERNES; CASE WORKER ENNIS WRIGHT and LAW LIBRARY SUPERVISOR JAQUES GRAHAM; FOOD SUPERVISOR MANAGER DWAINE WILSON; ATTORNEY GENERAL FRANK A. TODDRE, II, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE JERRY A WIESE; SGT. ALEXIS LOZANO; SGT. JULIE MATOUSEC; SGT. DUGAN; OFFICER JOEL QUEROZ, sued in the Individual and Official capacities, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Defendant(s). Before me are the motion for equal access to HDSP’s law library (ECF NO. 194) and the motion to clarify (ECF NO. 195). Defendants filed a response stating that plaintiff visited the law library on April 22, 2022. (ECF No. 196). This issue is now moot. Plaintiff’s motion to clarify (ECF No. 195) is asking for Judge Dorsey to clarify ECF No. 73 in case no. 2:17-cv-1620-JAD-VCF. This motion is erroneously filed in this case. Accordingly, 25 1 1 2 I ORDER that the motion for equal access to HDSP’s law library (ECF NO. 194) is DENIED as MOOT. 3 I FURTHER ORDER that the motion to clarify (ECF NO. 195) is STRICKEN in this case. 4 DATED this 23rd day of May 2022. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?