Peck v. State of Nevada, ex rel et al
Filing
199
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the motion for equal access to HDSP's law library (ECF NO. 194 ) is DENIED as MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to clarify (ECF NO. 195 ) is STRICKEN in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/23/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
FRANK PECK,
4
Plaintiff(s),
2:18-cv-00237-APG-VCF
ORDER
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
v.
STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. Nevada
Department of Correction, et al.; PRISON
COMMISSIONERS; GOVERNOR BRIAN
SANDOVAL; SECRETARY OF STATE
BARBARA CEGAVSKI; ATTORNEY
GENERAL ADAM LAXALT; DIRECTOR OF
PRISONS JAMES DZURENDA; WARDEN
BRIAN WILLIAMS, HDSP; ASSOCIATE
WARDEN JENNIFER NASH; ASSOCIATE
WARDEN PERRY RUSSELL; ACTING
ASSOCIATE WARDEN T. TIERNES; CASE
WORKER ENNIS WRIGHT and LAW
LIBRARY SUPERVISOR JAQUES
GRAHAM; FOOD SUPERVISOR MANAGER
DWAINE WILSON; ATTORNEY GENERAL
FRANK A. TODDRE, II, DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE JERRY A WIESE; SGT. ALEXIS
LOZANO; SGT. JULIE MATOUSEC; SGT.
DUGAN; OFFICER JOEL QUEROZ, sued in
the Individual and Official capacities,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Defendant(s).
Before me are the motion for equal access to HDSP’s law library (ECF NO. 194) and the motion
to clarify (ECF NO. 195).
Defendants filed a response stating that plaintiff visited the law library on April 22, 2022. (ECF
No. 196). This issue is now moot.
Plaintiff’s motion to clarify (ECF No. 195) is asking for Judge Dorsey to clarify ECF No. 73 in
case no. 2:17-cv-1620-JAD-VCF. This motion is erroneously filed in this case.
Accordingly,
25
1
1
2
I ORDER that the motion for equal access to HDSP’s law library (ECF NO. 194) is DENIED as
MOOT.
3
I FURTHER ORDER that the motion to clarify (ECF NO. 195) is STRICKEN in this case.
4
DATED this 23rd day of May 2022.
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?