Peck v. State of Nevada, ex rel et al
Filing
79
ORDER granting 76 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 68 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 69 Motion for TRO. Responses due by 5/28/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
JARED M. FROST (Bar No. 11132)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
555 East Washington Avenue
Suite 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: (702) 486-3177
Facsimile: (702) 486-3773
Email: jfrost@ag.nv.gov
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants James Dzurenda
Brian Williams, Troy Ternes, Alexis
Lozano, Jennifer Nash, Duane Wilson,
Joel Quiroz, Perry Russell, Jacques Graham,
Shanon Ennis-Wright, Julie Matousek, Brian
Sandoval, Adam Laxalt, Barbara Cegavske,
Francis Moka, Alfonso Alvarez, and Monique
Hubbard-Pickett
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
FRANK PECK,
16
Case No. 2:18-cv-00237-APG-VCF
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
27
STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. Nevada Department
of Correction, et al.; PRISON
COMMISSIONERS; GOVERNOR BRIAN
SANDOVAL; SECRETARY OF STATE
BARBARA CEGAVSKI; ATTORNEY GENERAL
ADAM LAXALT; DIRECTOR OF PRISONS
JAMES DZURENDA; WARDEN BRIAN
WILLIAMS, HDSP; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
JENNIFER NASH; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
PERRY RUSSELL; ACTING ASSOCIATE
WARDEN T. TIERNES; CASE WORKER ENNIS
WRIGHT and LAW LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
JAQUES GRAHAM; FOOD SUPERVISER
MANAGER DWAINE WILSON; ATTORNEY
GENERAL FRANK A. TODDRE, II, DISTRICT
COURT JUDGE JERRY A WIESE; SGT.
ALEXIS LOZANO; SGT. JULIE MATOUSEC;
SGT. DUGAN; OFFICER JOEL QUEROZ, sued
in the Individual and Official capacities,
28
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
30
Page 1 of 5
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION AND
RESTRAINING ORDER
(ECF NO. 68 AND 69)
1
Defendants James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, Troy Ternes, Alexis Lozano, Jennifer
2
Nash, Duane Wilson, Joel Quiroz, Perry Russell, Jacques Graham, Shanon Ennis-Wright,
3
Julie Matousek, Brian Sandoval, Adam Laxalt, Barbara Cegavske, Francis Moka, Alfonso
4
Alvarez, and Monique Hubbard-Pickett, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada
5
Attorney General, and Jared M. Frost, Senior Deputy Attorney General, hereby request an
6
additional thirty-three (33) days to respond to Plaintiff’s “Motion for Preliminary
7
Injunction and Restraining Order” filed April 11, 2019, and docketed at ECF No. 68 and
8
ECF No. 69. Defendants’ request is made and based on the following memorandum of
9
points and authorities, the attached Declaration of Counsel, the pleadings and papers on
10
file, and any other evidence the Court deems appropriate to consider.
11
12
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
I.
BACKGROUND
13
This is a prisoner civil rights matter. ECF No. 7.
14
On July 5, 2018, the Court screened Plaintiff’s Complaint. ECF No. 6. Pursuant to
15
16
17
the Screening Order, Plaintiff was permitted to proceed on numerous claims. See id.
On December 7, 2018, the parties participated in a mediation conference at which
no resolution was reached. ECF No. 22.
18
On January 24, 2019, the Attorney General filed an Acceptance of Service for
19
Defendants James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, Troy Ternes, Alexis Lozano, Jennifer Nash,
20
Duane Wilson, Joel Quiroz, Perry Russell, Jacques Graham, Shanon Ennis-Wright, and
21
Julie Matousek.
22
On January 31, 2019, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. ECF No. 40.
23
On April 1, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint pursuant to
24
Defendants’ request. ECF No. 65. The Court incorporated its previous findings concerning
25
claims presented in the original Complaint and allowed Plaintiff to proceed on additional
26
claims. Id. at 3-5.
27
28
30
On April 11, 2019, Plaintiff filed his “Motion for Preliminary Injunction and
Restraining Order.” ECF No. 68; ECF No. 69.
Page 2 of 5
1
On April 15, 2019, Defendants filed a Motion for Case Management Conference due
2
to the complexity of the case and Plaintiff’s practice and history of filing frivolous,
3
unsupported, or unnecessary motions. ECF No. 70.
4
5
On April 18, 2019, the Attorney General filed an Acceptance of Service for Francis
Moka, Alfonso Alvarez, and Monique Hubbard-Pickett. ECF No. 72.
6
7
On April 24, 2019, the Court scheduled a hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Case
Management Conference for May 7, 2019. ECF No. 74.
8
9
10
This motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s April 2019 preliminary
injunction motion follows.
II.
11
APPLICABLE LAW
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A), the Court may extend the
12
time to perform an act within a specified time for good cause shown.
13
III.
ARGUMENT
14
Defendants submit that good cause exists to extend the time to respond to Plaintiff’s
15
April 2019 preliminary injunction motion. Defendants’ response is currently due April 25,
16
2019. Since Plaintiff filed his motion on April 11, the undersigned has reviewed the motion
17
and requested information and records from prison staff needed to complete a response.
18
Exhibit 1 (Declaration of Counsel).However, the undersigned has been unable to complete
19
a response due to his responsibilities to meet deadlines in this and other cases. See id.
20
Further, the Court recently scheduled a hearing on Defendants’ motion for a case
21
management conference, through which Defendants seek a protective order regarding
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
30
Page 3 of 5
1
Plaintiff’s motion practice. See ECF No. 70 at 7. Defendants therefore request an extension
2
of thirty-three (33) days, or until May 28, 2019, to file a response to Plaintiff’s motion.
3
DATED this 25th day of April, 2019.
4
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
5
6
By: /s/ Jared M. Frost
JARED M. FROST (Bar No. 11132)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
7
8
Attorneys for Defendants
9
10
11
12
ORDER
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants shall have until May 28, 2019, to file a Response to
15
16
17
Plaintiff’s “Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Restraining Order” (ECF No. 68; ECF
No. 69).
Dated: April _____ day of ________________, 2019.
Dated this 26, 2019.
18
19
20
____________________________________________
UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
Page 4 of 5
EXHIBIT 1
Declaration of
Counsel
EXHIBIT 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
JARED M. FROST (Bar No. 11132)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
555 East Washington Avenue
Suite 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: (702) 486-3177
Facsimile: (702) 486-3773
Email: jfrost@ag.nv.gov
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants James Dzurenda
Brian Williams, Troy Ternes, Alexis
Lozano, Jennifer Nash, Duane Wilson,
Joel Quiroz, Perry Russell, Jacques Graham,
Shanon Ennis-Wright, Julie Matousek, Brian
Sandoval, Adam Laxalt, Barbara Cegavske,
Francis Moka, Alfonso Alvarez, and Monique
Hubbard-Pickett
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
FRANK PECK,
16
Case No. 2:18-cv-00237-APG-VCF
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
27
STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. Nevada Department
of Correction, et al.; PRISON
COMMISSIONERS; GOVERNOR BRIAN
SANDOVAL; SECRETARY OF STATE
BARBARA CEGAVSKI; ATTORNEY GENERAL
ADAM LAXALT; DIRECTOR OF PRISONS
JAMES DZURENDA; WARDEN BRIAN
WILLIAMS, HDSP; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
JENNIFER NASH; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
PERRY RUSSELL; ACTING ASSOCIATE
WARDEN T. TIERNES; CASE WORKER ENNIS
WRIGHT and LAW LIBRARY SUPERVISOR
JAQUES GRAHAM; FOOD SUPERVISER
MANAGER DWAINE WILSON; ATTORNEY
GENERAL FRANK A. TODDRE, II, DISTRICT
COURT JUDGE JERRY A WIESE; SGT.
ALEXIS LOZANO; SGT. JULIE MATOUSEC;
SGT. DUGAN; OFFICER JOEL QUEROZ, sued
in the Individual and Official capacities,
28
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
30
Page 1 of 3
DECLARATION OF
COUNSEL
1
2
I, JARED M. FROST, hereby declare, based on personal knowledge and/or information
and belief, that the following assertions are true:
3
1.
I am a Senior Deputy Attorney General employed by the Nevada Attorney
4
General in the Litigation Division, and I make this declaration in support of Defendants’
5
motion to extend the time in which to file a Response to Plaintiff’s “Motion for Preliminary
6
Injunction and Restraining Order” filed April 11, 2019, and docketed at ECF No. 68 and
7
ECF No. 69.
8
2.
Since Plaintiff filed his motion on April 11, 2019, I have reviewed the motion
9
and requested information and records from prison staff needed to complete a response.
10
However, I have been unable to complete the response due to my responsibilities to meet
11
deadlines in this and other cases.
12
3.
My responsibilities to meet deadlines during the past two weeks include:
13
Mizzoni v. State of Nevada, Case No. 2:17-cv-01482 (opposition to plaintiff’s summary
14
judgment motion filed 04/25/19, reply regarding defendants’ motion for summary judgment
15
filed 04/15/19); Carley v. Gentry et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-02670 (reply regarding defendants’
16
motion for summary judgment filed 04/24/19); Mitchell v. State of Nevada, Case No. 2:17-cv-
17
00686 (substantive response to motion to extend time filed 04/24/19); Jackson v. State of
18
Nevada et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-00995 (reply regarding defendants’ motion for summary
19
judgment filed 04/23/19); Johnson v. Lewis, Case No. 2:17-cv-01668 (response to motion to
20
consolidate cases filed 04/18/19); and Peck v. State of Nevada et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-00237
21
(response to objection to order filed 04/17/19, motion for case management conference filed
22
04/15/19).
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
30
Page 2 of 3
1
4.
2
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1746 Declarant certifies, under penalty of perjury, that
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
the foregoing is true and correct.
DATED this 25th day of April, 2019.
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
By: /s/ Jared M. Frost
JARED M. FROST (Bar No. 11132)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?