Peck v. State of Nevada, ex rel et al

Filing 79

ORDER granting 76 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 68 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 69 Motion for TRO. Responses due by 5/28/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 AARON D. FORD Attorney General JARED M. FROST (Bar No. 11132) Senior Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 East Washington Avenue Suite 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 486-3177 Facsimile: (702) 486-3773 Email: jfrost@ag.nv.gov 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants James Dzurenda Brian Williams, Troy Ternes, Alexis Lozano, Jennifer Nash, Duane Wilson, Joel Quiroz, Perry Russell, Jacques Graham, Shanon Ennis-Wright, Julie Matousek, Brian Sandoval, Adam Laxalt, Barbara Cegavske, Francis Moka, Alfonso Alvarez, and Monique Hubbard-Pickett 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 FRANK PECK, 16 Case No. 2:18-cv-00237-APG-VCF Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 27 STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. Nevada Department of Correction, et al.; PRISON COMMISSIONERS; GOVERNOR BRIAN SANDOVAL; SECRETARY OF STATE BARBARA CEGAVSKI; ATTORNEY GENERAL ADAM LAXALT; DIRECTOR OF PRISONS JAMES DZURENDA; WARDEN BRIAN WILLIAMS, HDSP; ASSOCIATE WARDEN JENNIFER NASH; ASSOCIATE WARDEN PERRY RUSSELL; ACTING ASSOCIATE WARDEN T. TIERNES; CASE WORKER ENNIS WRIGHT and LAW LIBRARY SUPERVISOR JAQUES GRAHAM; FOOD SUPERVISER MANAGER DWAINE WILSON; ATTORNEY GENERAL FRANK A. TODDRE, II, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE JERRY A WIESE; SGT. ALEXIS LOZANO; SGT. JULIE MATOUSEC; SGT. DUGAN; OFFICER JOEL QUEROZ, sued in the Individual and Official capacities, 28 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 Page 1 of 5 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF NO. 68 AND 69) 1 Defendants James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, Troy Ternes, Alexis Lozano, Jennifer 2 Nash, Duane Wilson, Joel Quiroz, Perry Russell, Jacques Graham, Shanon Ennis-Wright, 3 Julie Matousek, Brian Sandoval, Adam Laxalt, Barbara Cegavske, Francis Moka, Alfonso 4 Alvarez, and Monique Hubbard-Pickett, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada 5 Attorney General, and Jared M. Frost, Senior Deputy Attorney General, hereby request an 6 additional thirty-three (33) days to respond to Plaintiff’s “Motion for Preliminary 7 Injunction and Restraining Order” filed April 11, 2019, and docketed at ECF No. 68 and 8 ECF No. 69. Defendants’ request is made and based on the following memorandum of 9 points and authorities, the attached Declaration of Counsel, the pleadings and papers on 10 file, and any other evidence the Court deems appropriate to consider. 11 12 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES I. BACKGROUND 13 This is a prisoner civil rights matter. ECF No. 7. 14 On July 5, 2018, the Court screened Plaintiff’s Complaint. ECF No. 6. Pursuant to 15 16 17 the Screening Order, Plaintiff was permitted to proceed on numerous claims. See id. On December 7, 2018, the parties participated in a mediation conference at which no resolution was reached. ECF No. 22. 18 On January 24, 2019, the Attorney General filed an Acceptance of Service for 19 Defendants James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, Troy Ternes, Alexis Lozano, Jennifer Nash, 20 Duane Wilson, Joel Quiroz, Perry Russell, Jacques Graham, Shanon Ennis-Wright, and 21 Julie Matousek. 22 On January 31, 2019, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. ECF No. 40. 23 On April 1, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint pursuant to 24 Defendants’ request. ECF No. 65. The Court incorporated its previous findings concerning 25 claims presented in the original Complaint and allowed Plaintiff to proceed on additional 26 claims. Id. at 3-5. 27 28 30 On April 11, 2019, Plaintiff filed his “Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Restraining Order.” ECF No. 68; ECF No. 69. Page 2 of 5 1 On April 15, 2019, Defendants filed a Motion for Case Management Conference due 2 to the complexity of the case and Plaintiff’s practice and history of filing frivolous, 3 unsupported, or unnecessary motions. ECF No. 70. 4 5 On April 18, 2019, the Attorney General filed an Acceptance of Service for Francis Moka, Alfonso Alvarez, and Monique Hubbard-Pickett. ECF No. 72. 6 7 On April 24, 2019, the Court scheduled a hearing on Defendants’ Motion for Case Management Conference for May 7, 2019. ECF No. 74. 8 9 10 This motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s April 2019 preliminary injunction motion follows. II. 11 APPLICABLE LAW Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A), the Court may extend the 12 time to perform an act within a specified time for good cause shown. 13 III. ARGUMENT 14 Defendants submit that good cause exists to extend the time to respond to Plaintiff’s 15 April 2019 preliminary injunction motion. Defendants’ response is currently due April 25, 16 2019. Since Plaintiff filed his motion on April 11, the undersigned has reviewed the motion 17 and requested information and records from prison staff needed to complete a response. 18 Exhibit 1 (Declaration of Counsel).However, the undersigned has been unable to complete 19 a response due to his responsibilities to meet deadlines in this and other cases. See id. 20 Further, the Court recently scheduled a hearing on Defendants’ motion for a case 21 management conference, through which Defendants seek a protective order regarding 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 30 Page 3 of 5 1 Plaintiff’s motion practice. See ECF No. 70 at 7. Defendants therefore request an extension 2 of thirty-three (33) days, or until May 28, 2019, to file a response to Plaintiff’s motion. 3 DATED this 25th day of April, 2019. 4 AARON D. FORD Attorney General 5 6 By: /s/ Jared M. Frost JARED M. FROST (Bar No. 11132) Senior Deputy Attorney General 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants 9 10 11 12 ORDER 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendants shall have until May 28, 2019, to file a Response to 15 16 17 Plaintiff’s “Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Restraining Order” (ECF No. 68; ECF No. 69). Dated: April _____ day of ________________, 2019. Dated this 26, 2019. 18 19 20 ____________________________________________ UNITEDSTATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT 1 Declaration of Counsel EXHIBIT 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 AARON D. FORD Attorney General JARED M. FROST (Bar No. 11132) Senior Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 East Washington Avenue Suite 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 486-3177 Facsimile: (702) 486-3773 Email: jfrost@ag.nv.gov 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants James Dzurenda Brian Williams, Troy Ternes, Alexis Lozano, Jennifer Nash, Duane Wilson, Joel Quiroz, Perry Russell, Jacques Graham, Shanon Ennis-Wright, Julie Matousek, Brian Sandoval, Adam Laxalt, Barbara Cegavske, Francis Moka, Alfonso Alvarez, and Monique Hubbard-Pickett 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 FRANK PECK, 16 Case No. 2:18-cv-00237-APG-VCF Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 27 STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. Nevada Department of Correction, et al.; PRISON COMMISSIONERS; GOVERNOR BRIAN SANDOVAL; SECRETARY OF STATE BARBARA CEGAVSKI; ATTORNEY GENERAL ADAM LAXALT; DIRECTOR OF PRISONS JAMES DZURENDA; WARDEN BRIAN WILLIAMS, HDSP; ASSOCIATE WARDEN JENNIFER NASH; ASSOCIATE WARDEN PERRY RUSSELL; ACTING ASSOCIATE WARDEN T. TIERNES; CASE WORKER ENNIS WRIGHT and LAW LIBRARY SUPERVISOR JAQUES GRAHAM; FOOD SUPERVISER MANAGER DWAINE WILSON; ATTORNEY GENERAL FRANK A. TODDRE, II, DISTRICT COURT JUDGE JERRY A WIESE; SGT. ALEXIS LOZANO; SGT. JULIE MATOUSEC; SGT. DUGAN; OFFICER JOEL QUEROZ, sued in the Individual and Official capacities, 28 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 30 Page 1 of 3 DECLARATION OF COUNSEL 1 2 I, JARED M. FROST, hereby declare, based on personal knowledge and/or information and belief, that the following assertions are true: 3 1. I am a Senior Deputy Attorney General employed by the Nevada Attorney 4 General in the Litigation Division, and I make this declaration in support of Defendants’ 5 motion to extend the time in which to file a Response to Plaintiff’s “Motion for Preliminary 6 Injunction and Restraining Order” filed April 11, 2019, and docketed at ECF No. 68 and 7 ECF No. 69. 8 2. Since Plaintiff filed his motion on April 11, 2019, I have reviewed the motion 9 and requested information and records from prison staff needed to complete a response. 10 However, I have been unable to complete the response due to my responsibilities to meet 11 deadlines in this and other cases. 12 3. My responsibilities to meet deadlines during the past two weeks include: 13 Mizzoni v. State of Nevada, Case No. 2:17-cv-01482 (opposition to plaintiff’s summary 14 judgment motion filed 04/25/19, reply regarding defendants’ motion for summary judgment 15 filed 04/15/19); Carley v. Gentry et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-02670 (reply regarding defendants’ 16 motion for summary judgment filed 04/24/19); Mitchell v. State of Nevada, Case No. 2:17-cv- 17 00686 (substantive response to motion to extend time filed 04/24/19); Jackson v. State of 18 Nevada et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-00995 (reply regarding defendants’ motion for summary 19 judgment filed 04/23/19); Johnson v. Lewis, Case No. 2:17-cv-01668 (response to motion to 20 consolidate cases filed 04/18/19); and Peck v. State of Nevada et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-00237 21 (response to objection to order filed 04/17/19, motion for case management conference filed 22 04/15/19). 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 30 Page 2 of 3 1 4. 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1746 Declarant certifies, under penalty of perjury, that 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. the foregoing is true and correct. DATED this 25th day of April, 2019. AARON D. FORD Attorney General By: /s/ Jared M. Frost JARED M. FROST (Bar No. 11132) Senior Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?