Abrahams v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc. et al
Filing
17
ORDER Denying 16 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. The parties shall file a renewed joint proposed discovery plan no later than 4/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
SHARON A. ABRAHAMS,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
v.
13
JACKSON HEWITT, INC., et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:18-cv-00263-RFB-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 16)
15
16
Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint proposed discovery plan seeking special scheduling
17
review. Docket No. 16. The parties seek an extended discovery period of 240 days starting from March
18
19, 2018, the date on which the parties held their Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) conference, as opposed to the date
19
the first Defendant answered or appeared, February 19, 2018. Id. at 1; see also Docket No. 5; Local Rule
20
26-1(b)(1). A discovery period longer than the presumptively reasonable discovery period of 180 days
21
“must include...a statement of the reasons why longer or different time periods should apply....” Local
22
Rule 26-1(a). The parties ask for an extended discovery period given “the procedural posture of the
23
case, and given Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss.” Docket No. 16 at 1. The Court finds that
24
these are insufficient reasons to depart from the presumptively reasonable discovery period of 180 days.
25
Local Rule 26-1(b)(1).
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice the parties’ joint proposed discovery plan.
2
Docket No. 16. The parties shall file a renewed joint proposed discovery plan no later than April 16,
3
2018.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: April 11, 2018
6
7
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?