Sanchez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER accepting 31 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff Manuel Sanchez's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 MANUEL SANCHEZ, 4 Plaintiff Case No.: 2:18-cv-00282-APG-CWH Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case 5 v. [ECF No. 31] 6 WAL-MART STORES, INC., 7 8 Defendant On May 23, 2019, Magistrate Judge Hoffman recommended I dismiss this case because 9 plaintiff Manuel Sanchez has failed to respond to the court’s order to show cause or to appear at 10 the show cause hearing. ECF No. 31. Sanchez did not file an objection. Thus, I am not 11 obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 12 (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or 13 specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 14 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s 15 findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in 16 original)). I nevertheless conducted a de novo review. Judge Hoffman sets forth the proper legal 17 analysis and factual basis for the decision. 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Hoffman’s report and recommendation (ECF 19 No. 31) is accepted. Plaintiff Manuel Sanchez’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. 20 DATED this 11th day of June, 2019. 21 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?