Ceasario v. Berryhill
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Extend Time. Motion due by 1/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DAYLE ELIESON
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
ELIZABETH FIRER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415-977-8937
Email: Elizabeth.Firer@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DISTRICT OF NEVADA (LAS VEGAS)
SAM CEASARIO,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
) Case No. 2:18-cv-00336-JAD-CWH
)
)
)
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
)
EXTENSION OF TIME
)
(THIRD REQUEST)
)
)
)
)
16
17
Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) respectfully
18
requests for the second time that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Cross-Motion for
19
Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, due on January 3, 2018, by 14 days, through and
20
including January 17, 2018.
2019
2019
21
An extension of time is needed in order to prepare Defendant’s brief because the attorney
22
responsible for drafting the brief is required to go through in-house reviews for newer attorneys and the
23
attorney responsible for reviewing the brief is out on unexpected medical leave. This request is made in
24
good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
25
26
-1-
1
2
3
Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel’s office on January 3, 2019. Plaintiff’s
counsel does not oppose this motion.
Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of January 2019.
4
DAYLE ELIESON
United States Attorney
5
6
/s/ Elizabeth Firer
ELIZABETH FIRER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
7
8
9
10
11
S. WYETH MCADAM
Of Counsel
IT IS SO ORDERED:
12
13
14
15
16
CARL W. HOFFMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DATED:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
January 4, 2019
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?