Ceasario v. Berryhill

Filing 24

ORDER granting 23 Motion to Extend Time. Motion due by 1/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAYLE ELIESON United States Attorney District of Nevada ELIZABETH FIRER Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-977-8937 Email: Elizabeth.Firer@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DISTRICT OF NEVADA (LAS VEGAS) SAM CEASARIO, Plaintiff, v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) Case No. 2:18-cv-00336-JAD-CWH ) ) ) UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ) EXTENSION OF TIME ) (THIRD REQUEST) ) ) ) ) 16 17 Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) respectfully 18 requests for the second time that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Cross-Motion for 19 Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, due on January 3, 2018, by 14 days, through and 20 including January 17, 2018. 2019 2019 21 An extension of time is needed in order to prepare Defendant’s brief because the attorney 22 responsible for drafting the brief is required to go through in-house reviews for newer attorneys and the 23 attorney responsible for reviewing the brief is out on unexpected medical leave. This request is made in 24 good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. 25 26 -1- 1 2 3 Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel’s office on January 3, 2019. Plaintiff’s counsel does not oppose this motion. Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of January 2019. 4 DAYLE ELIESON United States Attorney 5 6 /s/ Elizabeth Firer ELIZABETH FIRER Special Assistant United States Attorney 7 8 9 10 11 S. WYETH MCADAM Of Counsel IT IS SO ORDERED: 12 13 14 15 16 CARL W. HOFFMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2- January 4, 2019

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?