Ceasario v. Berryhill
Filing
29
ORDER denying 18 Motion to Remand ; ORDER granting 25 Countermotion to Affirm the Agency Decision; ORDER adopting 27 Report and Recommendation; Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/14/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
Sam Ceasario,
4
Case No. 2:18-cv-00336-JAD-CWH
Plaintiff
Order Adopting Report and
Recommendation
v.
5
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of
6 Social Security Administration,
[ECF Nos. 18, 25, 27]
7
Defendant
8
9
Plaintiff Sam Ceasario brings this action to challenge the Social Security Commissioner’s
10 denial of his request for disability-insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The
11 magistrate judge has evaluated the briefing in this case and recommends that I deny Ceasario’s
12 motion to remand and grant the Commissioner’s cross-motion to affirm that decision. 1 The
13 deadline for objections to that recommendation passed without objection or any request to extend
14 the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and
15 recommendation unless objections are filed.” 2
16
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
17 [ECF No. 27] is ADOPTED in full;
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Remand [ECF No. 18] is DENIED, and
19 the Cross-motion to Affirm [ECF No. 25] is GRANTED;
20
21
22
1
23
2
ECF No. 27.
Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474
U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
1
The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS
2 CASE.
3
Dated: August 14, 2019
4
_________________________________
_______________
__ ____ _ _
_
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
ge Jennifer A. Do
e Jen
D
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?