Mariscal v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al

Filing 5

ORDER granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER denying 2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel ; ORDER denying 3 Motion for Hearing; Petitioner will have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 DAVID MARISCAL, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Petitioner, Case No. 2:18-cv-00347-GMN-VCF ORDER v. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents. Petitioner has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) and a 18 petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court finds that petitioner 19 is unable to pay the filing fee. 20 Petitioner challenges his custody pursuant to the judgment of conviction of the Second 21 Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Case No. CR94-0080. Petitioner challenged his 22 custody pursuant to the same judgment of conviction in Mariscal v. Skolnik, Case No. 3:07-cv- 23 00296-LRH-VPC. The court denied that petition on its merits, and the court of appeals denied a 24 certificate of appealability. Consequently, the current petition is a second or successive petition 25 under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). Petitioner must first obtain authorization from the court of appeals 26 before this court can consider his petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Nothing in the documents 27 that petitioner has filed indicates that he has received such authorization. Petitioner will need to 28 show cause why the court should not dismiss the action. 1 1 Petitioner has filed a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2) and a request for 2 evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 3). The court denies these motions because it appears that 3 petitioner is not authorized to proceed with this action. If petitioner can show authorization, then 4 he may renew these motions. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. Petitioner need not pay the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00). IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner’s request for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 3) is DENIED. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner will have thirty (30) days from the date of 14 entry of this order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as a second or 15 successive petition. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this action. 16 DATED: June 20, 2018 17 ______________________________ GLORIA M. NAVARRO Chief United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?