Mariscal v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al

Filing 8

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. A Certificate of Appealability will not issue. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 DAVID MARISCAL, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 Case No. 2:18-cv-00347-GMN-VCF ORDER v. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents. 16 17 The court ordered (ECF No. 5) petitioner to show cause why this action should not be 18 dismissed as a second or successive petition. Petitioner has filed a response (ECF No. 7). 19 Petitioner presents arguments why the court should consider the petition. However, under 28 20 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3), he needs to present these arguments to the court of appeals, not to this court. 21 Reasonable jurists would not find the court’s conclusion to be debatable or wrong, and the 22 court will not issue a certificate of appealability. 23 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED as a second or successive 24 habeas corpus action. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this 25 action. 26 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue. 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that that the clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk shall electronically serve upon respondents a copy of this order. No response is necessary. DATED: July 13, 2018 6 ______________________________ GLORIA M. NAVARRO Chief United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?