Schumacher v. United States Forest Service

Filing 36

PROTECTIVE ORDER Granting 35 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 11/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH United States Attorney 2 District of Nevada Nevada Bar No. 13644 3 BRIANNA SMITH 4 Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar No. 11795 5 501 Las Vegas Boulevard, South, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 6 Telephone: 702-388-6336 Email: Brianna.Smith@usdoj.gov 7 Attorneys for the United States 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 Jane Schumacher, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 2:18-cv-00375-RFB-DJA v. Sonny Perdue, Secretary of the Department of Agriculture; and DOES I thru X. [Proposed] Stipulation for Protective Order for Confidential Information Defendants. Plaintiff and Defendant, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and request 18 the entry of a protective order pursuant to 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e)(1)(i) as stated herein. 19 Without admission or waiver by any party, the general nature of this action is as 20 follows: This action is an alleged employment discrimination case. Plaintiff alleges that 21 she has received medical treatment as a result of the discrimination. 22 The discovery to be requested and produced in this matter involve medical records 23 that contain confidential information including, but not limited to, information protected 24 by the Health Insurance Portability and Protection Act (HIPAA) of 1996, Pub. L. No. 10425 191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996). Through this protective order, the parties seek to address the 26 handling of such medical records that are likely to contain confidential information 27 protected by the HIPAA. In order to permit the parties to discover and disclose to each 28 other such confidential information as is relevant to this case, and pursuant to Rule 26 of Case 2:18-cv-00375-RFB-DJA Document 35 Filed 11/04/19 Page 2 of 4 1 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and federal regulation 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e)(1)(i), 2 the parties stipulate to the following: 3 1. The United States is authorized to release to other parties in this case records 4 and information otherwise protected by the Privacy Act without obtaining prior written 5 consent of the individual(s) to whom such records pertain, provided that such information 6 is reasonably related to this litigation. Nothing in the protective order is intended to limit 7 or preclude in any way the United States’ existing rights to access and review documents 8 containing HIPAA protected information. 9 2. Whenever counsel for any party believes that formal or informal discovery in 10 this case, in whatever form, may reveal or has revealed medical and/or other records that 11 are likely to contain confidential information including, but not limited to, records and 12 information protected by HIPAA, the following procedures shall be followed: 13 a. Counsel for the party producing records containing confidential 14 information shall designate the information as subject to this order by letter and by marking 15 documents containing such information with the notation “CONFIDENTIAL.” Upon 16 request from the other party, counsel for the producing party will promptly explain its basis 17 for designating material as being subject to the protective order. 18 b. The right of access to all records designated “CONFIDENTIAL” 19 under this order (unless the parties have agreed otherwise or the Court enters a separate 20 order permitting disclosure) shall be limited to the parties, counsel for the parties, 21 consultants, and expert witnesses, as well as staff in their employ with a need for access in 22 order for each party to prosecute or defend this action including, but not limited to, 23 paralegals, legal assistants, and nurses, and any other persons mutually authorized by all 24 counsel to examine such materials. Any person having access to information subject to this 25 order shall be informed that it is confidential and subject to a protective (non-disclosure) 26 order of the Court. Persons outside the employ of the parties or counsel, such as retained 27 consultants and expert witnesses, shall sign an acknowledgment in accordance with 28 paragraph 2(d) below. 2 Case 2:18-cv-00375-RFB-DJA Document 35 Filed 11/04/19 Page 3 of 4 1 c. Except as provided herein, no person having access to records 2 designated as subject to this order shall reveal to any person not named in paragraph 2(b) 3 any information contained in such material without further order of the Court or 4 stipulation of the parties. 5 d. Each person outside the employ of a party or counsel, such as 6 retained consultants and expert witnesses, to whom is disclosed records or information 7 designated “CONFIDENTIAL” under this protective order, shall sign and date an 8 acknowledgment, substantially in the form as that attached hereto, affirming that they have 9 read and agree to be bound by the terms of this protective order, and the retaining counsel 10 shall maintain a copy of such acknowledgement in his or her files. 11 e. When a CONFIDENTIAL record is marked as an exhibit, or 12 otherwise used during questioning at a deposition, counsel shall inform the court reporter 13 of the CONFIDENTIAL designation, and the document and applicable portions of the 14 deposition transcript shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with the terms of 15 this order. 16 f. CONFIDENTIAL records shall be filed, if at all, under seal, subject 17 to and in accordance with, Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 18 2006) and this Court’s CM/ECF filing procedures for sealed materials. 19 g. If a party disagrees with a designation of any records or information 20 as CONFIDENTIAL, such party shall serve a written notice of objection and bases for 21 objection within fifteen (15) days of the production of the designated CONFIDENTIAL 22 records or information. The parties shall then have fifteen (15) days to confer in good faith 23 efforts to resolve the dispute, and no motion concerning same shall be filed with the Court 24 during this period of time to confer. If the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, the 25 party asserting the CONFIDENTIAL designation shall file an appropriate motion with the 26 Court within fifteen (15) days after the parties’ failure to resolve the dispute. The failure to 27 timely serve a written objection and bases, as set forth herein, shall constitute a waiver of 28 the objection. The failure to timely file an appropriate motion with the Court, as set forth 3 1 herein, shall constitute a waiver of the designation. Until such time as any designation 2 dispute is resolved by the parties or adjudicated by the Court, the parties shall treated 3 designated records or information as CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with the terms of 4 this order. 5 h. Within forty-five (45) days of the conclusion of all trial and any 6 appellate proceedings in this case, counsel for the receiving party shall either return to 7 counsel for the producing party all documents and copies of documents designated as 8 “CONFIDENTIAL” under this order or certify that such documents and copies have been 9 destroyed. 10 i. This order is without prejudice to the rights of any party to introduce, 11 or object to the introduction, into evidence at trial or during summary judgment 12 proceedings any materials that are subject to this order. 13 j. This order is without prejudice to the rights of any party to make any 14 objections to discovery requests as permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 15 statute or other authority. 16 Respectfully submitted this 4th day of November, 2019. 17 REMPFER MOTT LUNDY, PLLC 18 /s/Scott Lundy Scott E. Lundy, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14235 Joseph N. Mott, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12455 10091 Park Run Dr., #200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145-8868 702-825-5303 Scott@rmllegal.com Joey@rmllegal.com Attorney for Plaintiff 19 20 21 22 23 24 NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH United States Attorney /s/ Brianna Smith BRIANNA SMITH Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Sonny Perdue IT IS SO ORDERED: 25 26 ____ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 DATED: November 5, 2019 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?