JB Carter Enterprises, LLC v. Elavon, Inc.

Filing 68

ORDER Granting 67 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 59 , 64 Motions for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 5/3/2019. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

MICHAEL R. MUSHKIN, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 2421
L. JOE COPPEDGE, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 4954
MUSHKIN • CICA • COPPEDGE
4495 S. Pecos Road
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702-454-3333
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ATM Merchant Systems

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

11
12
13
14

JB CARTER ENTERPRISES, LLC DBA
ATM MERCHANT SYSTEMS, a Nevada
limited-liability company

Case No.: 2:18-cv-00394-JAD-NJK

Plaintiff,

15
16

vs.

17

ELAVON, INC., a Georgia Corporation; DOE
DEFENDANTS 1 through 10; and ROE DOE
DEFENDANTS 1 through 10;

18
19
20

Defendants.

21

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ONE DAY

22

(SECOND REQUEST)

23

Plaintiff, JB Carter Enterprises, LLC d/b/a ATM Merchant Systems, (“ATMMS” or

24

“Plaintiff”), by and through its attorneys of record, Michael R. Mushkin, Esq. and L. Joe

25

Coppedge, Esq., of the law firm Mushkin Cica Coppedge, and Defendant Elavon (“Defendant”),

26

by and through its attorneys of record, Joseph G. Went and Sydney R. Gambee of the law firm

27

of Holland & Hart stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for the parties to respond to the

28

respective Motions for Summary Judgment (“Motions”) filed herein.
Page 1 of 2

1

In support of this stipulation, the parties state that on March 28, 2019, Defendant filed its

2

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 59) and Plaintiff filed its Motion for Partial Summary

3

Judgment (Doc. 64). After the filing of the Motions, the parties agreed to extend the deadlines

4

for both parties to respond to the Motions for a period of two (2) weeks (Doc. 65). Since then,

5

lead counsel for the Plaintiff has been in a trial all week and has been unable review or

6

comment on the opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties have

7

agreed to extend the deadline for both parties to respond to the Motions for one (1) day so

8

Plaintiff’s lead counsel can review and provide meaningful comment to Plaintiff’s opposition.

9

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s

10

Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 64), currently due on May 2, 2019 shall be

11

extended for one day to May 3, 2019.

12

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s

13

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 59), currently due on May 2, 2019 shall be extended for

14

one day to May 3, 2019.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Dated this 2nd day of May, 2019

Dated this 2nd day of May, 2019

MUSHKIN • CICA • COPPEDGE

HOLLAND & HART

/s/L. Joe Coppedge
MICHAEL R. MUSHKIN
Nevada State Bar No. 2421
L. JOE COPPEDGE
Nevada State Bar No. 4954
4495 S. Pecos Road
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ATM Merchant Systems

/s/ Sydney R. Gambee
JOSEPH G. WENT
Nevada Bar No. 9220
SYDNEY R. GAMBEE
Nevada Bar No. 14201
9555 Hillwood Drive, Second Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Attorneys for Defendant
Elavon

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED: __________________
Dated: May 3, 2019.
Page 2 of 2