JB Carter Enterprises, LLC v. Elavon, Inc.

Filing 96

ORDER granting 93 Stipulation to Extend time to file a Reply to defendant's 91 Response to the 82 Motion for Attorney Fees. Replies due by 3/13/2020. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/3/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00394-JAD-NJK Document 95 Filed 02/27/20 Page 1 of 2 1 Joseph G. Went, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9220 2 Sydney R. Gambee, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14201 3 HOLLAND & HART LLP 9555 Hillwood Drive, Second Floor 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 Tel: (702) 669-4600 5 Fax: (702) 669-4650 Email: jgwent@hollandhart.com 6 srgambee@hollandhart.com 7 Attorneys for Elavon, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOLLAND & HART LLP 9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor Las Vegas, NV 89134 Phone: (702) 669-4600 Fax: (702) 669-4650 10 JB CARTER ENTERPRISES, LLC DBA ATM MERCHANT SYSTEMS, a Nevada 11 Limited Liability Company, Case No.: 2:18-cv-00394-JAD-NJK 14 ELAVON, INC., a Georgia Corporation; DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10; and ROE 15 DEFENDANTS 11-20; STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR ELAVON, INC. TO FILE ITS REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND NONTAXABLE COSTS AND OBJECTION TO BILL OF COSTS (ECF NO. 91) 16 (First Request) 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. Defendants. ECF No. 95 17 18 Defendant ELAVON, INC. (“Elavon”) and Plaintiff JB CARTER ENTERPRISES, LLC 19 DBA ATM MERCHANT SYSTEMS, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 20 (“ATMMS”), by and through their respective counsel of record, and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, hereby 21 stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Elavon, Inc. to file and serve its Reply to Plaintiff’s 22 Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs and Objection to Bill 23 of Costs (ECF No. 91). On February 4, 2020, Elavon filed its Bill of Costs (ECF No. 80) and 24 Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs (ECF No. 82). On February 18, 2020, the parties 25 agreed to extend the deadline for ATMMS to file its Response to the Bill of Costs and Motion for 26 Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs to February 21, 2020 (ECF No. 85). On February 21, 2020, 27 ATMMS filed its Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs and 28 Objection to Bill of Costs (ECF No. 91). Page 1 of 2 Case 2:18-cv-00394-JAD-NJK Document 95 Filed 02/27/20 Page 2 of 2 1 Due to scheduling issues relating to other work-related matters, including counsel for 2 Elavon’s absence from the office for a hearing in Reno, Nevada, the parties have agreed to extend 3 the deadline for Elavon to file its Reply to ATMMS’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for 4 Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs and Objection to Bill of Costs (ECF No. 91) for fourteen 5 (14) days. 6 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the deadline for Elavon to file and serve its Reply to 7 ATMMS’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs and 8 Objection to Bill of Costs (ECF No. 91) currently due February 28, 2020 shall be extended to 9 March 13, 2020. HOLLAND & HART LLP This is the first request for extension of this deadline for Elavon’s Reply. 11 9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor Las Vegas, NV 89134 Phone: (702) 669-4600 Fax: (702) 669-4650 10 STIPULATED AND AGREED TO this 27th day of February, 2020. 12 13 16 /s/ Sydney R. Gambee Joseph G. Went, Esq. Sydney R. Gambee, Esq. HOLLAND & HART LLP 9555 Hillwood Drive, Second Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 /s/ L. Joe Coppedge Michael R. Mushkin, Esq. L. Joe Coppedge, Esq. MUSHKIN * CICA * COPPEDGE 4495 S. Pecos Road Las Vegas, Nevada 89121 17 Attorneys for Elavon, Inc. Attorney for JB Carter Enterprises, LLC dba ATM Merchant System 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER 23 24 Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF Nos. 93, 95], IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of ____________________, 2020. 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JU ES DI DISTRICT JUDGE CT CT 3-3-2020 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?