JB Carter Enterprises, LLC v. Elavon, Inc.
Filing
96
ORDER granting 93 Stipulation to Extend time to file a Reply to defendant's 91 Response to the 82 Motion for Attorney Fees. Replies due by 3/13/2020. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/3/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
Case 2:18-cv-00394-JAD-NJK Document 95 Filed 02/27/20 Page 1 of 2
1 Joseph G. Went, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9220
2 Sydney R. Gambee, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14201
3 HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, Second Floor
4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Tel: (702) 669-4600
5 Fax: (702) 669-4650
Email: jgwent@hollandhart.com
6
srgambee@hollandhart.com
7 Attorneys for Elavon, Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Phone: (702) 669-4600 Fax: (702) 669-4650
10 JB CARTER ENTERPRISES, LLC DBA
ATM MERCHANT SYSTEMS, a Nevada
11 Limited Liability Company,
Case No.: 2:18-cv-00394-JAD-NJK
14 ELAVON, INC., a Georgia Corporation;
DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10; and ROE
15 DEFENDANTS 11-20;
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
FOR ELAVON, INC. TO FILE ITS
REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND
NONTAXABLE COSTS AND
OBJECTION TO BILL OF COSTS (ECF
NO. 91)
16
(First Request)
12
13
Plaintiff,
vs.
Defendants.
ECF No. 95
17
18
Defendant ELAVON, INC. (“Elavon”) and Plaintiff JB CARTER ENTERPRISES, LLC
19
DBA ATM MERCHANT SYSTEMS, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
20
(“ATMMS”), by and through their respective counsel of record, and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, hereby
21
stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Elavon, Inc. to file and serve its Reply to Plaintiff’s
22
Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs and Objection to Bill
23
of Costs (ECF No. 91). On February 4, 2020, Elavon filed its Bill of Costs (ECF No. 80) and
24
Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs (ECF No. 82). On February 18, 2020, the parties
25
agreed to extend the deadline for ATMMS to file its Response to the Bill of Costs and Motion for
26
Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs to February 21, 2020 (ECF No. 85). On February 21, 2020,
27
ATMMS filed its Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs and
28
Objection to Bill of Costs (ECF No. 91).
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cv-00394-JAD-NJK Document 95 Filed 02/27/20 Page 2 of 2
1
Due to scheduling issues relating to other work-related matters, including counsel for
2
Elavon’s absence from the office for a hearing in Reno, Nevada, the parties have agreed to extend
3
the deadline for Elavon to file its Reply to ATMMS’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for
4
Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs and Objection to Bill of Costs (ECF No. 91) for fourteen
5
(14) days.
6
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the deadline for Elavon to file and serve its Reply to
7
ATMMS’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Nontaxable Costs and
8
Objection to Bill of Costs (ECF No. 91) currently due February 28, 2020 shall be extended to
9
March 13, 2020.
HOLLAND & HART LLP
This is the first request for extension of this deadline for Elavon’s Reply.
11
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Phone: (702) 669-4600 Fax: (702) 669-4650
10
STIPULATED AND AGREED TO this 27th day of February, 2020.
12
13
16
/s/ Sydney R. Gambee
Joseph G. Went, Esq.
Sydney R. Gambee, Esq.
HOLLAND & HART LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, Second Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
/s/ L. Joe Coppedge
Michael R. Mushkin, Esq.
L. Joe Coppedge, Esq.
MUSHKIN * CICA * COPPEDGE
4495 S. Pecos Road
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
17
Attorneys for Elavon, Inc.
Attorney for JB Carter Enterprises, LLC dba
ATM Merchant System
14
15
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER
23
24
Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF Nos. 93, 95], IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of ____________________, 2020.
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JU
ES DI
DISTRICT JUDGE
CT
CT
3-3-2020
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?