Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. et al v. AGS, LLC et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting 9 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer/Respond re: 1 Complaint. AGS, LLC answer due 4/11/2018; PlayAGS, Inc. answer due 4/11/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00396-GMN-GWF Document 9 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CRAIG MARIAM, ESQ. Nevada State Bar No. 10926 ROBERT E. SCHUMACHER, ESQ. Nevada State Bar No. 7504 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 577-9300 Direct Line: (702) 577-9319 Facsimile: (702) 255-2858 Email: cmariam@grsm.com rschumacher@grsm.com Attorneys for Defendants AGS, LLC AND PLAYAGS, INC. GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, NV 89101 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD., and ARISTOCRAT INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD., Plaintiffs, 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) vs. AGS, LLC, and PLAYAGS, INC., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:18-cv-00396 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AGS, LLC AND PLAYAGS, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AGS, LLC AND PLAYAGS, INC., TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 22 Defendants, AGS, LLC and PLAYAGS, Inc., (“Defendants”) by and though their counsel 23 of record, Craig Mariam, Esq. and Robert E. Schumacher, Esq., of the law firm of GORDON 24 REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP (“GRSM”), and Plaintiffs ARISTOCRAT 25 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD., and 26 ARISTOCRAT INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD. (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of 27 record, Nicholas J. Santoro, Esq. and Jason D. Smith, Esq., of the law firm of SANTORO 28 -1- Case 2:18-cv-00396-GMN-GWF Document 9 Filed 03/27/18 Page 2 of 4 1 WHITMIRE, hereby stipulate and agree to allow Defendants an additional two weeks to respond 2 to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Defendants’ response is currently due on March 28, 2018 and will be 3 continued to April 11, 2018. 4 Said continuance is being stipulated to in order to give Defendants adequate time to 5 respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint in light of GRSM’ recent retention and for potential resolution 6 of Plaintiffs’ claims. 7 DATED this 22nd day of March, 2018. DATED this 27th day of March, 2018. 8 SANTORO WHITMIRE GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP /s/ Jason D. Smith NICHOLAS J. SANTORO, ESQ. Nevada State Bar No. 532 JASON D. SMITH, ESQ. Nevada State Bar No. 9691 10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD., AND ARISTOCRAT INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD. /s/ Robert E. Schumacher CRAIG MARIAM, ESQ. Nevada State Bar No. 10926 ROBERT E. SCHUMACHER, ESQ. Nevada State Bar No. 7504 300 S. 4TH Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorney for Defendants, AGS, LLC and PLAYAGS, INC. 9 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, NV 89101 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Case 2:18-cv-00396-GMN-GWF Document 9 Filed 03/27/18 Page 3 of 4 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation and good cause showing therefore: 3 Defendants will have until April 11, 2018 to respond Plaintiffs’ Complaint. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 8 DATED: _______________________ 3/28/2018 9 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, NV 89101 10 Respectfully Submitted: 11 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 /s/ Robert E. Schumacher CRAIG MARIAM, ESQ. Nevada State Bar 10926 ROBERT E. SCHUMACHER, ESQ. Nevada State Bar No. 7504 300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorney for Defendants AGS, LLC and PLAYAGS, INC. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?