Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. et al v. AGS, LLC et al
Filing
11
ORDER granting 9 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer/Respond re: 1 Complaint. AGS, LLC answer due 4/11/2018; PlayAGS, Inc. answer due 4/11/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:18-cv-00396-GMN-GWF Document 9 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
CRAIG MARIAM, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 10926
ROBERT E. SCHUMACHER, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 7504
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: (702) 577-9300
Direct Line: (702) 577-9319
Facsimile: (702) 255-2858
Email: cmariam@grsm.com
rschumacher@grsm.com
Attorneys for Defendants
AGS, LLC AND PLAYAGS, INC.
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, NV 89101
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
14
15
ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES
AUSTRALIA PTY LTD., and ARISTOCRAT
INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD.,
Plaintiffs,
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
vs.
AGS, LLC, and PLAYAGS, INC.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:18-cv-00396
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS AGS, LLC AND
PLAYAGS, INC. TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS AGS,
LLC AND PLAYAGS, INC., TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
22
Defendants, AGS, LLC and PLAYAGS, Inc., (“Defendants”) by and though their counsel
23
of record, Craig Mariam, Esq. and Robert E. Schumacher, Esq., of the law firm of GORDON
24
REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP (“GRSM”), and Plaintiffs ARISTOCRAT
25
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD., and
26
ARISTOCRAT INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD. (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of
27
record, Nicholas J. Santoro, Esq. and Jason D. Smith, Esq., of the law firm of SANTORO
28
-1-
Case 2:18-cv-00396-GMN-GWF Document 9 Filed 03/27/18 Page 2 of 4
1
WHITMIRE, hereby stipulate and agree to allow Defendants an additional two weeks to respond
2
to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. Defendants’ response is currently due on March 28, 2018 and will be
3
continued to April 11, 2018.
4
Said continuance is being stipulated to in order to give Defendants adequate time to
5
respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint in light of GRSM’ recent retention and for potential resolution
6
of Plaintiffs’ claims.
7
DATED this 22nd day of March, 2018.
DATED this 27th day of March, 2018.
8
SANTORO WHITMIRE
GORDON REES SCULLY
MANSUKHANI, LLP
/s/ Jason D. Smith
NICHOLAS J. SANTORO, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 532
JASON D. SMITH, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 9691
10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES
AUSTRALIA PTY LTD., AND
ARISTOCRAT INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD.
/s/ Robert E. Schumacher
CRAIG MARIAM, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 10926
ROBERT E. SCHUMACHER, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 7504
300 S. 4TH Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorney for Defendants,
AGS, LLC and PLAYAGS, INC.
9
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, NV 89101
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case 2:18-cv-00396-GMN-GWF Document 9 Filed 03/27/18 Page 3 of 4
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation and good cause showing therefore:
3
Defendants will have until April 11, 2018 to respond Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
8
DATED: _______________________
3/28/2018
9
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI, LLP
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, NV 89101
10
Respectfully Submitted:
11
GORDON REES SCULLY
MANSUKHANI, LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
/s/ Robert E. Schumacher
CRAIG MARIAM, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar 10926
ROBERT E. SCHUMACHER, ESQ.
Nevada State Bar No. 7504
300 S. 4th Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorney for Defendants
AGS, LLC and PLAYAGS, INC.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?