Vazquez et al v. Sefcik et al

Filing 12

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 11 proposed Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4
5

MARY VAZQUEZ,
6

Plaintiff,
7
8

vs.
DAVID SEFCIK, et al.,

9

2:18-cv-00400-APG-VCF
ORDER

Defendants.

10
11

Before the Court is the proposed Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 11).

12

Pursuant to LR 26-1(a), “[i]f the plan sets deadlines within those specified in LR 26-1(b), the plan

13

must state on its face in bold type, ‘SUBMITTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH LR 26-1(b).’ If longer

14

deadlines are proposed, the plan must state on its face ‘SPECIAL SCHEDULING REVIEW

15

REQUESTED.’ Plans requesting special scheduling review must include, in addition to the information

16

required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and LR 26-1(b), a statement of the reasons why longer or different

17

time periods should apply to the case…” Here, the parties have not complied with LR 26-1(a).

18

Accordingly,

19

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that proposed Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No.

20
21
22
23
24
25

11) is DENIED without prejudice.
DATED this 22nd day of March, 2018.
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE