Roche v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al

Filing 7

ORDER Granting 5 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) Re: 1 Complaint. Trans Union, LLC's answer due 5/3/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00434-GMN-GWF Document 5 Filed 03/26/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 JASON G. REVZIN Jason.Revzin@lewisbrisbois.com Nevada Bar No. 008629 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 (702) 893-3383 (702) 893-3789 Fax Counsel for Trans Union LLC 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 PAMELA J. ROCHE, 11 Case No. 2:18-cv-00434-GMN-GWF Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, BOULDER DAM FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, SYNCHRONY BANK d/b/a SYNCB/AMAZON PLCC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, and TRANS UNION, LLC, 14 15 16 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT TRANS UNION LLC’S TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Pamela Roche (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”), 19 by and through their respective counsel, file this Joint Stipulation Extending Defendant Trans 20 Union’s Time to File an Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. 21 On March 09, 2018, Plaintiff filed her Complaint. The current deadline for Trans Union 22 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is April 03, 2018. The allegations in 23 Plaintiff’s Complaint date back to February 2017 and relate to two accounts allegedly discharged 24 by her spouse’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Trans Union needs additional time to locate and assemble 25 the documents relating to Plaintiff’s credit file and any disputes submitted by Plaintiff. In 26 27 28 4845-5360-4960.1 1 Case 2:18-cv-00434-GMN-GWF Document 5 Filed 03/26/18 Page 2 of 3 1 addition, Trans Union’s counsel needs additional time to review Trans Union’s documents and 2 respond to the allegations in the Complaint. 3 Plaintiff has agreed to extend the deadline in which Trans Union has to answer or 4 otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint up to and including May 03, 2018. This is the first 5 stipulation for extension of time for Trans Union to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The time 6 within which Trans Union must respond to the Complaint has not yet expired. 7 WHEREFORE, Defendant Trans Union respectfully requests this Court to enter an Order 8 granting this Joint Stipulation Extending Defendant Trans Union’s Time to File an Answer or 9 Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and extend the deadline for Trans Union to file its 10 responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to and including May 03, 2018. 11 DATED: March 26, 2018 12 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 13 /s/ Jason G. Revzin Jason G. Revzin Jason.revzin@lewisbrisbois.com Nevada Bar No. 008629 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 6385 South Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89118 (702) 893-3383 (702) 893-3789 Fax Counsel for Trans Union LLC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ Rachel B. Saturn David H. Krieger dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com Rachel B. Saturn Rachel@hainesandkrieger.com Haines & Krieger, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 (702) 880-5554 (702) 383-5518 Fax Counsel for Plaintiff 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4845-5360-4960.1 2 Case 2:18-cv-00434-GMN-GWF Document 5 Filed 03/26/18 Page 3 of 3 1 ORDER 2 IT IS SO ORDERED that the above Joint Stipulation Extending Defendant Trans 3 Union’s Time to File an Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and extend the 4 deadline for Trans Union to file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to and 5 including May 03, 2018 is granted. 6 7 March 27, 2018 DATED: _______________________________ 8 9 HONORABLE GEORGE FOLEY, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4845-5360-4960.1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?