Roche v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
Filing
7
ORDER Granting 5 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) Re: 1 Complaint. Trans Union, LLC's answer due 5/3/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:18-cv-00434-GMN-GWF Document 5 Filed 03/26/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
JASON G. REVZIN
Jason.Revzin@lewisbrisbois.com
Nevada Bar No. 008629
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
(702) 893-3383
(702) 893-3789 Fax
Counsel for Trans Union LLC
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
PAMELA J. ROCHE,
11
Case No. 2:18-cv-00434-GMN-GWF
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,
BOULDER DAM FEDERAL CREDIT
UNION, SYNCHRONY BANK d/b/a
SYNCB/AMAZON PLCC, EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, and
TRANS UNION, LLC,
14
15
16
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING DEFENDANT TRANS
UNION LLC’S TIME TO FILE AN
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (FIRST
REQUEST)
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff Pamela Roche (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”),
19
by and through their respective counsel, file this Joint Stipulation Extending Defendant Trans
20
Union’s Time to File an Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
21
On March 09, 2018, Plaintiff filed her Complaint. The current deadline for Trans Union
22
to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is April 03, 2018. The allegations in
23
Plaintiff’s Complaint date back to February 2017 and relate to two accounts allegedly discharged
24
by her spouse’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Trans Union needs additional time to locate and assemble
25
the documents relating to Plaintiff’s credit file and any disputes submitted by Plaintiff. In
26
27
28
4845-5360-4960.1
1
Case 2:18-cv-00434-GMN-GWF Document 5 Filed 03/26/18 Page 2 of 3
1
addition, Trans Union’s counsel needs additional time to review Trans Union’s documents and
2
respond to the allegations in the Complaint.
3
Plaintiff has agreed to extend the deadline in which Trans Union has to answer or
4
otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint up to and including May 03, 2018. This is the first
5
stipulation for extension of time for Trans Union to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The time
6
within which Trans Union must respond to the Complaint has not yet expired.
7
WHEREFORE, Defendant Trans Union respectfully requests this Court to enter an Order
8
granting this Joint Stipulation Extending Defendant Trans Union’s Time to File an Answer or
9
Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and extend the deadline for Trans Union to file its
10
responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to and including May 03, 2018.
11
DATED: March 26, 2018
12
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
13
/s/ Jason G. Revzin
Jason G. Revzin
Jason.revzin@lewisbrisbois.com
Nevada Bar No. 008629
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
6385 South Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89118
(702) 893-3383
(702) 893-3789 Fax
Counsel for Trans Union LLC
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
/s/ Rachel B. Saturn
David H. Krieger
dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Rachel B. Saturn
Rachel@hainesandkrieger.com
Haines & Krieger, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
(702) 880-5554
(702) 383-5518 Fax
Counsel for Plaintiff
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4845-5360-4960.1
2
Case 2:18-cv-00434-GMN-GWF Document 5 Filed 03/26/18 Page 3 of 3
1
ORDER
2
IT IS SO ORDERED that the above Joint Stipulation Extending Defendant Trans
3
Union’s Time to File an Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint and extend the
4
deadline for Trans Union to file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint, up to and
5
including May 03, 2018 is granted.
6
7
March 27, 2018
DATED: _______________________________
8
9
HONORABLE GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4845-5360-4960.1
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?