Federal Trade Commission v. AWS, LLC et al

Filing 92

ORDER granting Stipulation for Qualified Turnover of Reserve Funds. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00442-JCM-PAL Document 89 Filed 09/10/18 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Michael F. Lynch (NV SBN 8555) Michael@LynchLawPractice.com LYNCH LAW PRACTICE, PLLC 3613 S. Eastern Ave. Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 684-6000 Facsimile: (702) 543-3279 Gary Owen Caris (CA SBN 088918) gcaris@btlaw.com Admitted Pro Hac Vice dated March 27, 2018 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 300 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 284-3880 Facsimile: (310) 284-3894 9 10 Attorneys for Receiver ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES LLC 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Case No. 2:18-cv-00442-JCM-PAL Plaintiff, 15 16 v. 17 AWS, LLC, et al., 18 STIPULATED ORDER FOR QUALIFIED TURNOVER OF RESERVE FUNDS Defendants. 19 20 21 The Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), the Court-Appointed Receiver Robb Evans 22 & Associates LLC (the “Receiver”), Non-Party Synovus Bank (“Synovus”), and Non-Party 23 Qualpay, Inc. (“Qualpay,” and collectively with Synovus, the “Acquirers”) stipulate to the entry 24 of this Stipulated Order for Qualified Turnover of Reserve Funds to facilitate the resolution of 25 competing claims to the reserve funds referenced in Section III, paragraph C, subsection 31 of the 26 Court’s Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment (the “Stipulated 27 Order”) [Doc. No. 80]. 28 B ARNES & T HORNBURG LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES Case 2:18-cv-00442-JCM-PAL Document 89 Filed 09/10/18 Page 2 of 4 1 THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 2 1. The Acquirers currently hold $2,601,106.85 in reserve funds associated with 3 payment card transactions initiated by cardholders doing business with Defendant FBA Stores 4 LLC (the “Reserve Funds”). The FTC and the Receiver claim that such Reserve Funds are 5 property of Defendant FBA Stores LLC and must be turned over to the Receiver pursuant to the 6 Stipulated Order. The Acquirers, by contrast, claim that such Reserve Funds, as well as income 7 therefrom, are not the property of the Defendants and that, in any event, the Acquirers are entitled 8 to use those Reserve Funds to offset consumer-initiated chargebacks based on, inter alia, 9 ownership of the Reserve Funds, their contract with Defendant FBA Stores, their security interest 10 11 in the Reserve Funds, and the doctrine of recoupment. 2. The FTC and the Receiver have agreed to promptly negotiate with the Acquirers in 12 good faith regarding the proper disposition of the Reserve Funds, but only after a preliminary 13 turnover of the Reserve Funds to the Receiver. At the same time, the FTC and the Receiver have 14 agreed that such a turnover will not operate to prejudice or limit the rights, claims, or defenses of 15 the Acquirers vis-à-vis the Reserve Funds, if any. 16 3. The Court therefore ORDERS the Acquirers to turn over the Reserve Funds to the 17 Receiver, but finds that such a turnover will not impair, and is without prejudice to or limitation 18 on, the Acquirers’ rights, claims, and defenses with respect to the Reserve Funds, and income 19 therefrom, whether based on ownership of the Reserve Funds, the Acquirers’ contract with 20 Defendant FBA Stores, any security interest in the Reserve Funds (and any perfection of that 21 security interest that exists or existed prior to the turnover), the doctrine of recoupment, or 22 otherwise. 23 4. The Receiver shall place the Reserve Funds on deposit in a separate interest- 24 bearing receivership account. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, such funds shall not be 25 available to pay the expenses of the receivership estate. In the event the Receiver shall seek any 26 disbursement of Reserve Funds or income therefrom, the Receiver shall give the Acquirers 27 fourteen (14) days advance notice of such request and an opportunity to object. Should any 28 B ARNES & T HORNBURG LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES -2- Case 2:18-cv-00442-JCM-PAL Document 89 Filed 09/10/18 Page 3 of 4 1 objection be filed with the Court, the Receiver shall not make such disbursement until the Court 2 resolves Acquirer(s)’ objection 3 4 SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: September 12, 2018. 6 JAMES C. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B ARNES & T HORNBURG LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES -3- Case 2:18-cv-00442-JCM-PAL Document 89 Filed 09/10/18 Page 4 of 4 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 4 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is: 2029 Century Park East, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90067. On September 10, 2018, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: STIPULATED ORDER FOR QUALIFIED TURNOVER OF RESERVE FUNDS on the interested party(ies) below, using the following means: 6 All parties identified for Notice of Electronic Filing generated by the Court’s CM/ECF system under the referenced case caption and number 7 8 9 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL. I caused the document(s) to be sent to the respective e-mail address(es) of the party(ies) as stated above. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. 10 11 12    Edward A. Marshall, edward.marshall@agg.com Steven Kaufmann, SKaufmann@mofo.com Theresa Kananen, Theresa.Kananen@AGG.com 13 14 15 I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. 16 Executed on September 10, 2018 at Los Angeles, California. 17 /s/ Stephanie L. Moore Stephanie L. Moore 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 13260096v1 27 28 B ARNES & T HORNBURG LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW LOS A NG EL ES -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?