Randolph v. Baker et al

Filing 70

ORDER Granting 69 Motion to Extend Time. Replies re 62 Motion to Dismiss due by 1/20/2023. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/23/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 AARON D. FORD Attorney General Erica Berrett (Bar. No. 13826) Senior Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 486-3110 (phone) (702) 486-2377 (fax) EBerrett@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Respondents 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 ROGER RANDOLPH, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, vs. RENEE BAKER, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-00449-RFB-VCF UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 68) (FIRST REQUEST) Respondents. 15 16 Respondents move this Court for an enlargement of time of sixty (60) days from the current due 17 date of November 21, 2022, up to and including January 20, 2023, in which to file their reply to 18 Randolph’s Opposition to Renewed Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 68). This 19 Motion is made pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) and Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice and is based 20 upon the attached declaration of counsel. This is the first enlargement of time sought by Respondents to 21 file a reply to opposition to renewed motion to dismiss, and the request is brought in good faith and not 22 for the purpose of delay. 23 DATED: November 21, 2022. 24 Submitted by: 25 AARON D. FORD Attorney General 26 27 28 By: /s/ Erica Berrett Erica Berrett (Bar. No. 13826) Senior Deputy Attorney General Page 1 of 4 1 DECLARATION OF ERICA BERRETT 2 I, ERICA BERRETT, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and state as follows: 3 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all courts within the State of Nevada and am 4 employed as a Senior Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada Attorney General. I am 5 responsible to represent Respondents in Roger Randolph v. Renee Baker, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-00449- 6 RFB-VCF, and as such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein. 7 2. This Motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. 8 3. The reply to Randolph’s Opposition to Renewed Motion to Dismiss Second Amended 9 10 Petition (ECF No. 68) is currently due November 21, 2022. I have been unable with due diligence to timely complete the reply. 4. 11 Respondents were initially given only seven days to file this reply, in accordance with the 12 local rules. See ECF No. 33 at 2. During this period, I have largely spent my time working on an amended 13 answer in capital habeas matter Guy v. Baca, 2:11-cv-01809-APG-NJK, among other federal habeas 14 matters. Looking forward, I need to continue to work on the answer in the capital habeas matter, Byford 15 v. Reubart, et al., 3:11-cv-00112-JCM-CSD, which is now on a fifth extension, due December 30, 2022, 16 and for which the Court has indicated it is unlikely to grant further extensions. Moreover, I have an oral 17 argument set on December 9, 2022, in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for Kelsey v. Baker, 22-15557, 18 3:18-cv-00174-MMD-CLB, for which I have been preparing and need to continue my preparations. 5. 19 In addition to these case-related responsibilities, my administrative responsibilities as a 20 Senior Deputy have been especially time-consuming in recent months, as we have continued to have 21 turnover within the Nevada Attorney General’s Post-Conviction Division, and I am responsible for case 22 assignment and reassignment for the large majority of federal habeas cases in the Division. I am also 23 responsible to review the pleadings of multiple Deputies. 6. 24 I have contacted Petitioner’s counsel regarding this request for enlargement of time, and 25 she does not oppose. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Page 2 of 4 1 2 7. Based on the foregoing, I respectfully request an enlargement of time of sixty (60) days, up to and including January 20, 2023, to file the reply. 3 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 4 Executed on November 21, 2022. 5 6 /s/ Erica Berrett Erica Berrett (Bar No. 13826) Senior Deputy Attorney General 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED: 9 10 11 12 13 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: ______________________________ DATED this 23rd day of November, 2022. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of 3 Time to File Reply to Opposition to Renewed Motion to Dismiss (First Request) with the Clerk of the 4 Court by using the CM/ECF system on November 21, 2022. 5 6 7 8 9 10 The following participants in this case are registered electronic filing system users and will be served electronically: Shelly Richter Assistant Federal Public Defender 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 /s/ C. Martinez An employee of the Office of the Attorney General 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?