Dey v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting 23 Stipulation; Re: 19 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 7/9/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 Phone: (702) 825-6060 Fax: (702) 447-8048 Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 Phone: (702) 880-5554 Fax: (702) 385-5518 Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 ROBERT D. DEY, 18 19 Plaintiff, vs. 20 21 22 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC; and TRANS UNION LLC, 25 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [FIRST REQUEST] Defendant. 23 24 Case No.: 2:18-cv-00502-RFB-CWH Plaintiff Robert D. Dey (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel of record, and Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”) have agreed and stipulated to the following: 26 1. On March 19, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1]. 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [FIRST REQUEST] - 1 1 On May 11, 2018, Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF Dkt. 3. 2 2. On May 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 17]. 4. On June 4, 2018 Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint 12]. 3 4 5 6 [ECF Dkt. 19]. 7 5. 6. 8 Plaintiff’s Response is due June 18, 2018. Plaintiff and Trans Union have agreed to extend Plaintiff’s response twenty-one 9 days in order to allow the parties to discuss possible resolution of this matter. As a result, both 10 11 Plaintiff and Trans Union hereby request this Court to further extend the date for Plaintiff to 12 respond to Trans Union’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint until July 9, 2018. This is the first request 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [FIRST REQUEST] - 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 for seeking an extension and is not made for purposes of delay. IT IS SO STIPULATED. June 15, 2018. KNEPPER & CLARK LLC LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH /s/ Miles N. Clark Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 10040 W. Cheyanne Ave., Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com miles.clark@knepperclark.com /s/ Jason Revzin Jason Revzin, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89118 Email: jason.revzin@lewisbrisbois.com Counsel for Defendant Trans Union LLC David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com Counsel for Plaintiff NAYLOR & BRASTER WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 /s/ Andrew J. Sharples Jennifer L. Braster, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9982 Andrew J. Sharples, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12866 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Email: jbraster@nblawnv.com Email: asharples@nblawnv.com Counsel for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. /s/ Andrew S. Bao Andrew A. Bao, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10508 6757 Spencer Street Las Vegas, NV 89119 Email: aabao@wolfewyman.com Counsel for Defendant Ditech Financial, LLC ORDER 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 ________________________________ ________________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED this 18th day of June, 2018. Dated: ______________ STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [FIRST REQUEST] - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?