Dey v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Stipulation; Re: 19 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 7/9/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Phone: (702) 825-6060
Fax: (702) 447-8048
Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com
Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Phone: (702) 880-5554
Fax: (702) 385-5518
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
17
ROBERT D. DEY,
18
19
Plaintiff,
vs.
20
21
22
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC.; DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC; and
TRANS UNION LLC,
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST]
Defendant.
23
24
Case No.: 2:18-cv-00502-RFB-CWH
Plaintiff Robert D. Dey (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel of record, and Trans Union
LLC (“Trans Union”) have agreed and stipulated to the following:
26
1.
On March 19, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Complaint [ECF Dkt. 1].
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST] - 1
1
On May 11, 2018, Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint [ECF Dkt.
3.
2
2.
On May 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [ECF Dkt. 17].
4.
On June 4, 2018 Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint
12].
3
4
5
6
[ECF Dkt. 19].
7
5.
6.
8
Plaintiff’s Response is due June 18, 2018.
Plaintiff and Trans Union have agreed to extend Plaintiff’s response twenty-one
9
days in order to allow the parties to discuss possible resolution of this matter. As a result, both
10
11
Plaintiff and Trans Union hereby request this Court to further extend the date for Plaintiff to
12
respond to Trans Union’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint until July 9, 2018. This is the first request
13
//
14
//
15
//
16
17
//
18
//
19
//
20
//
21
//
22
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST] - 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
for seeking an extension and is not made for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
June 15, 2018.
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
/s/ Miles N. Clark
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
10040 W. Cheyanne Ave., Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com
miles.clark@knepperclark.com
/s/ Jason Revzin
Jason Revzin, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
Las Vegas, NV 89118
Email: jason.revzin@lewisbrisbois.com
Counsel for Defendant Trans Union LLC
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
NAYLOR & BRASTER
WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
/s/ Andrew J. Sharples
Jennifer L. Braster, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9982
Andrew J. Sharples, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12866
1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Email: jbraster@nblawnv.com
Email: asharples@nblawnv.com
Counsel for Defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
/s/ Andrew S. Bao
Andrew A. Bao, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10508
6757 Spencer Street
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Email: aabao@wolfewyman.com
Counsel for Defendant Ditech Financial, LLC
ORDER
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
________________________________
________________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED this 18th day of June, 2018.
Dated: ______________
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[FIRST REQUEST] - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?