Shaw v. NP Santa Fe, LLC et al

Filing 23

ORDER Granting 22 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 20 Order (Second Request). Responses due by 9/26/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Margaret A. McLetchie, Nevada Bar No. 10931
Alina M. Shell, Nevada Bar No. 11711
MCLETCHIE SHELL LLC
701 East Bridger Avenue, Suite 520
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9

TONY SHAW,

Case. No.: 2:18-cv-00515-JCM-PAL

10
Plaintiff,

11

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
[phone] (T) / [phone] (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM

12

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT

vs.

13
14
15
16
17
18

NP SANTA FE, LLC DBA SANTA FE
STATION HOTEL & CASINO, a Nevada
Limited Liability Company; STATION
CASINOS, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability
Company; and RED ROCK RESORTS,
INC., a Delaware corporation,

(SECOND REQUEST)

Defendants.

19

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff TONY SHAW (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants NP

20

SANTA FE, LLC DBA SANTA FE STATION HOTEL & CASINO, STATION CASINOS,

21

LLC, AND RED ROCK RESORTS, INC. (“Defendants”), by and through their respective

22

counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline to file the

23

Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) Plaintiff’s Amended

24

Complaint (ECF No.8) filed on July 30, 2018 by an additional fourteen (14) days from the

25

current deadline of September 12, 2018 (see ECF No. 20) up to and including September 26,

26

2018. This is the second stipulation for extension of time to file response.

27
28

This Request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or
other purpose of delay. This request for extension is based upon the following:

1

1

Counsel for Plaintiff initiated this request due to competing deadlines, including an

2

emergency response brief in Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department v. Las Vegas

3

Review-Journal, Nevada Supreme Court Case No. 76848, due on September 10, 2018.

4
5

The parties are also actively discussing potential settlement resolution, and wish to
avoid incurring unnecessary fees and costs.

6

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the deadline

7

to file the Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) Plaintiff’s

8

Amended Complaint (ECF No.8) by an additional fourteen (14) days from the current

9

deadline of September 12, 2018 (see ECF No. 20) up to and including September 26, 2018.

10
11

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED this 11th day of September, 2018.

DATED this 11th day of September, 2018.

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
[phone] (T) / [phone] (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM

12
13
14
15
16
17

/s/ Margaret A. McLetchie
Margaret A. McLetchie, NBN 10931
Alina M. Shell, NBN 11711
MCLETCHIE SHELL LLC
701 East Bridger Avenue, Suite 520
Las Vegas, NV 89101

/s/ Lawrence J. Semenza III, Esq.
Lawrence J. Semenza III, Esq., NBN 7174
Christopher D. Kircher, Esq., NBN 11176
Jarrod L. Rickard, Esq., NBN 10203
SEMENZA KIRCHER RICKARD
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, NV 89145

Attorneys for Plaintiff
David B. Farkas, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
Carol Yur, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 Avenue of the Stars,
Suite 400, North Tower
Los Angeles, CA 90067

18
19
20
21

Attorneys for Defendants

22
23
24
25

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 12, ______________________, 2018.
DATED this _____ day of2018.

26
27
28

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

2