United States of America v. Douglas H. Clark et al

Filing 7

ORDER Granting 6 Joint Motion re: Priority. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00525-JAD-PAL Document 6 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RICHARD E. ZUCKERMAN Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General BORIS KUKSO Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-353-1857 (v) 202-307-0054 (f) Boris.Kukso@usdoj.gov Of Counsel: DAYLE ELIESON US Attorney 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 v. Case No. 2:18-CV-00525-JAD-PAL DOUGLAS H. CLARK, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; VERMICULUS CORPORATION OF NEVADA; DOUGLAS H. CLARK individually and as trustee of the LUNA PLENA 110325 REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST and of the AMBET REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST; REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.; CLARK COUNTY TREASURER; and CHIP-NDALES CUSTOM LANDSCAPING, INC. Order Granting Joint Motion re: Priority ECF NO. 6 ECF No. Defendants. 22 23 Stipulation As To Priority Between United States And Clark County And Proposed Order (Case No. 2:18-cv-00525-JAD-PAL) 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Tax Division, Western Region P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: 202-616-3395 Case 2:18-cv-00525-JAD-PAL Document 6 Filed 04/05/18 Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 STIPULATION AS TO PRIORITY BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND CLARK COUNTY AND PROPOSED ORDER Plaintiff, the United States of America, and defendant Clark County Treasurer (“Clark County”) agree as follows: 1. This Stipulation concerns the real property described in paragraph 1 of 6 the United States’ Complaint in this case. Dkt. No. 1. The real property is known as 7 the “Subject Property.” The Subject Property is located within Clark County. 8 2. Clark County imposes property taxes upon the assessed value of real 9 property within the County. By operation of Nevada law, Clark County has a lien 10 upon real property in the amount of property taxes that are due but unpaid. NRS 11 361.450, et seq. Any Clark County lien on the Subject Property shall remain until 12 any and all real property taxes due and owing, along with all penalties and costs, 13 are paid in full. 14 3. To the extent that property taxes on the Subject Property are due and 15 payable, but have not been paid, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6323(b)(6), those property 16 taxes have priority over the United States’ interest in the Subject Property. In the 17 18 19 20 event the Subject Property is sold, the United States agrees that proceeds of sale shall be applied to satisfy any property taxes on the Subject Property due and payable before being applied to satisfy the United States’ liens. 4. The parties agree to bear their own costs and fees. 21 22 23 Stipulation As To Priority Between United States And Clark County And Proposed Order (Case No. 2:18-cv-00525-JAD-PAL) 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Tax Division, Western Region P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: 202-616-3395 Case 2:18-cv-00525-JAD-PAL Document 6 Filed 04/05/18 Page 3 of 5 1 5. Clark County received a copy of the United States’ Complaint, waives 2 the service of summons, and agrees that this Court has jurisdiction over the res of 3 the Subject Property. 4 5 6 7 6. Except as stated herein, Clark County consents to judgment as requested in the United States’ Complaint. 7. The United States and Clark County jointly request the Court to enter the following proposed order. 8 9 Dated: April 4, 2018. Dated: April 4, 2018. RICHARD E. ZUCKERMAN Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General STEVEN B. WOLFSON District Attorney Civil Division State Bar No. 001565 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 /s/ Boris Kukso_______ BORIS KUKSO Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 202-353-1857 (v) 202-307-0054 (f) Boris.Kukso@usdoj.gov _/s/ Shannon Wittenberger__ Shannon Wittenberger Deputy District Attorney State Bar No. 012304 500 South Grand Central Pkwy. PO Box 552215 Las Vegas, NV 8915502215 702-455-4761 (v) 702-382-5178 (f) shannon.wittenberger@clarkcountyda. com * Permission to enter e-signature granted by email dated April 4, 2018. Of Counsel: U.S. Attorney Dayle Elieson Attorneys for United States 20 21 22 23 Stipulation As To Priority Between United States And Clark County And Proposed Order (Case No. 2:18-cv-00525-JAD-PAL) 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Tax Division, Western Region P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: 202-616-3395 Case 2:18-cv-00525-JAD-PAL Document 6 Filed 04/05/18 Page 4 of 5 1 2 Order Approving Stipulation 1. The foregoing Stipulation is approved. If the United States obtains an order 3 permitting it to sell Subject Property in connection with this case, the order shall 4 provide for the payment of any due and owing real property taxes to Clark County 5 6 7 8 9 before payment is made to satisfy the United States’ federal tax lien. Any Clark County lien on the Subject Properties shall remain until any and all real property taxes due and owing, along with all penalties and costs, are paid in full. 2. Subject to the terms of the Stipulation and this Order, Clark County shall be deemed to have consented to entry of judgment against it as requested in the 10 United States’ Complaint. 11 3. The Court construes this stipulation between fewer than all the parties to this 12 action as a joint motion under LR 7-1(c) and GRANTS it. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this _______ day of _____________, 20__. 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE STATE DISTRI TATE TA TATES STRICT STRI April 5, 2018 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Submitted by: RICHARD E. ZUCKERMAN Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General BORIS KUKSO Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice 23 Stipulation As To Priority Between United States And Clark County And Proposed Order (Case No. 2:18-cv-00525-JAD-PAL) 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Tax Division, Western Region P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: 202-616-3395

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?