Betten v. Berryhill

Filing 2

ORDER that 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice. Any renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis must be made on the long form (AO 239) to ensure that both Plaintiff's and his spouse's income, assets, and liabilities are properly considered. Any such application shall be filed by April 16, 2018. Alternatively, Plaintiff may pay the filing fee by April 16, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ROBERT D. BETTEN, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) v. ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner ) of Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant(s). ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:18-cv-00536-KJD-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 1) 16 Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket 17 No. 1. In determining whether to permit a plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court evaluates the 18 income and assets to which the plaintiff has access, including those of his spouse. See, e.g., Flores v. 19 Colvin, 2014 U.S. Dist. Lexis 93236, at *3-4 (D. Nev. May 22, 2014) (collecting cases). “If the plaintiff 20 is supported by [his] spouse, and [his] spouse is financially able to pay the costs of this appeal, it follows 21 that the plaintiff’s own lack of funds will not prevent [him] from gaining access to the courts.” Monti v. 22 McKeon, 600 F. Supp. 112, 114 (D. Conn. 1984). The pending application makes clear that Plaintiff’s 23 spouse is employed, but has failed to identify what her income is. Docket No. 1 at 1.1 Accordingly, the 24 application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice. 25 26 27 28 1 The application confusingly states that “[a]ll finances in this application are joint,” but identifies no incoming pay despite representing that Plaintiff’s wife is employed. See id. 1 Any renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis must be made on the long form (AO 239) 2 to ensure that both Plaintiff’s and his spouse’s income, assets, and liabilities are properly considered. Any 3 such application shall be filed by April 16, 2018. Alternatively, Plaintiff may pay the filing fee by April 4 16, 2018.2 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: April 3, 2018 7 ________________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Consistent with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff’s counsel shall carefully consider whether a reasonable basis exists for seeking in forma pauperis status before filing any renewed application. In particular, while the Court does not herein reach a final conclusion since the current application is incomplete, the tens of thousands of dollars of cash available to Plaintiff appears likely an insurmountable hurdle for any renewed application even without considering Plaintiff’s spouse’s income. See Docket No. 1 at 2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?