Primack v. Ohio Security Insurance Company et al

Filing 11

ORDER Denying 10 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. A renewed joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order shall be filed no later than May 23, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 BRETT PRIMACK, 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. 17 Docket No. 10. The joint proposed discovery plan does not include the required statement that the 18 parties have met and conferred about the possibility of using alternative dispute-resolution processes, 19 pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(b)(7). The joint proposed discovery plan also does not include the 20 required statement that the parties have considered consent to trial by a magistrate judge, pursuant 21 to Local Rule 26-1(b)(8). 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:18-cv-00561-APG-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 10) 22 Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice the parties’ joint proposed discovery plan 23 and scheduling order. Docket No. 10. A renewed joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling 24 order shall be filed no later than May 23, 2018. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: May 21, 2018 27 28 NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?