Wynn v. Bloom et al

Filing 56

ORDER Granting #55 Second Stipulation to Extend Deadline Set Forth In #49 Order re Renewed Anti-Slapp Motion. Responses due by 9/13/2019. Replies due by 10/11/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Case 2:18-cv-00609-JCM-NJK Document 55 Filed 08/15/19 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

12

L. LIN WOOD, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
NICOLE JENNINGS WADE, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
JONATHAN D. GRUNBERG, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
G. TAYLOR WILSON, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
L. LIN WOOD, P.C.
1180 West Peachtree Street, Suite 2040
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404.506.9111

13

Attorneys for Plaintiff Steve Wynn

7
8
9
10

701 S. 7 t h Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
702.786.1001

11
PETERSON BAKER, PLLC

TAMARA BEATTY PETERSON, ESQ., Bar No. 5218
[e-mail]
NIKKI L. BAKER, ESQ., Bar No. 6562
[e-mail]
PETERSON BAKER, PLLC
701 S. 7th Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702.786.1002

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15
16
17

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
STEVE WYNN, an individual,
Plaintiff,

18

v.

19
20

LISA BLOOM, an individual; and THE
BLOOM FIRM, a California Professional
Corporation,

21

Defendants.

22

Case No.: 2:18-cv-00609-JCM-NJK

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND DEADLINE SET FORTH IN
ORDER RE: COMPLETION OF
AUTHORIZED DISCOVERY AND
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON RENEWED
ANTI-SLAPP MOTION [ECF NO. 49]
[First Request]

23
24

Plaintiff Steve Wynn ("Mr. Wynn"), by and through his attorneys of record, Tamara Beatty

25

Peterson, Esq. and Nikki L. Baker, Esq., of Peterson Baker, PLLC, and L. Lin Wood, Esq., Nicole

26

Jennings Wade, Esq., Jonathan D. Grunberg, Esq., and G. Taylor Wilson, Esq., of L. Lin Wood,

27

P.C., and Defendants Lisa Bloom and The Bloom Firm (collectively, the "Bloom Defendants"),

28

by and through their attorneys of record, Marc J. Randazza, Esq., Ronald D. Green, Esq., and Alex

Case 2:18-cv-00609-JCM-NJK Document 55 Filed 08/15/19 Page 2 of 3

1

J. Shepard, Esq., of the Randazza Legal Group, PLLC, hereby agree and stipulate, subject to the

2

Court's approval, as follows:

3

1.

On May 5, 2019, the Court entered an order granting, in part, and denying, in part,

4

Mr. Wynn's Motion for Discovery to Respond to Defendants' Special Motion to Dismiss Pursuant

5

to NRS 41.660 (the "Discovery Order"). See ECF No. 45.

6

2.

In the Discovery Order, the Court ordered the Parties to "submit a proposed schedule

7

for completion of the authorized discovery, together with a briefing schedule on Defendants'

8

Renewed Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to NRS 41.660 (ECF No. 36)." See ECF No. 45 at 11:2-4.

9

3.

On May 17, 2019, the Court entered an Order approving the proposed stipulation of

the Parties, which set forth deadlines for completion of discovery and a briefing schedule. See ECF

11

No. 49.

12
701 S. 7 t h Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
702.786.1001

PETERSON BAKER, PLLC

10

4.

Among other deadlines, the Order stated that "Mr. Wynn shall file and serve his

13

response in opposition to the Renewed anti-SLAPP Motion on or before twenty-one (21) days

14

following the completion of the above-described discovery, and in any event no later than August

15

30, 2019," and that "[t]he Bloom Defendants shall file and serve their reply in support of the

16

Renewed anti-SLAPP Motion fourteen (14) days after service of Mr. Wynn's response." (Id. at ¶7).

17

5.

Mr. Wynn requested, and the Bloom Defendants agreed to, a short extension of the

18

above briefing deadlines in order to accommodate the schedule of Mr. Wynn's counsel. Mr. Wynn,

19

in turn, proposed to the Bloom Defendants that they may have additional time to file and serve their

20

reply brief.

21
22

6.

SLAPP Motion as follows:

23
24

The Parties agree and propose that the deadlines be extended for the Renewed anti-

a.

Mr. Wynn shall file and serve his response in opposition to the Renewed

anti-SLAPP Motion on or before September 13, 2019; and

25

b.

The Bloom Defendants shall file and serve their reply in support of the

26

Renewed anti-SLAPP Motion on or before October 11, 2019.

27

///

28

Case 2:18-cv-00609-JCM-NJK Document 55 Filed 08/15/19 Page 3 of 3

1
2
3
4

7.

The Parties respectfully submit that good cause exists for the Court to approve this

Stipulation.
Respectfully submitted this 15th day of August, 2019.
PETERSON BAKER, PLLC

RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC

5
6
7
8
9
10

12
701 S. 7th Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
702.786.1001

PETERSON BAKER, PLLC

11

13
14
15
16
17

By:_/s/ Nikki L. Baker________________
TAMARA BEATTY PETERSON ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5218
NIKKI L. BAKER, ESQ., Bar No. 6562
PETERSON BAKER, PLLC
701 S. 7th Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702.786.1002

By:_/s/ Marc J. Randazza______________
MARC J. RANDAZZA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12265
RONALD D. GREEN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7360
ALEX J. SHEPARD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13582
2764 Lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 305.437.7662
[e-mail]

L. LIN WOOD, ESQ.
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
NICOLE JENNINGS WADE, ESQ.
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
JONATHAN D. GRUNBERG, ESQ.
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
G. TAYLOR WILSON, ESQ.
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
L. LIN WOOD, P.C
1180 West Peachtree Street, Suite 2040
Atlanta, Georgia 30309

Attorneys for Defendants Lisa Bloom
and The Bloom Firm

Attorneys for Plaintiff Steve Wynn

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

____________________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
August 20, 2019
DATED: _______________________

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2