Froby v. Berryhill

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Motion to Extend Time. Motion due by 12/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00641-JAD-CWH Document 17 Filed 10/31/18 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAYLE ELIESON United States Attorney District of Nevada ELIZABETH FIRER Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-977-8937 Email: Elizabeth.Firer@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA (LAS VEGAS) WILLIAM J. FROBY, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) Case No. 2:18-cv-00641-JAD-CWH ) ) ) UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ) EXTENSION OF TIME ) (FIRST REQUEST) ) ) ) ) 16 17 Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) respectfully 18 requests for the first time that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Cross-Motion for 19 Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, due on November 8, 2018, by 30 days, through and 20 including December 10, 2018. 21 An extension of time is needed in order to prepare Defendant’s brief because of the caseload of 22 Defendant’s attorneys. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the 23 proceedings. 24 25 Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel on October 31, 2018. Plaintiff’s counsel does not oppose this motion. 26 -1- Case 2:18-cv-00641-JAD-CWH Document 17 Filed 10/31/18 Page 2 of 2 1 Respectfully submitted this 31st day of October 2018. 2 DAYLE ELIESON United States Attorney 3 /s/ Elizabeth Firer ELIZABETH FIRER Special Assistant United States Attorney 4 5 6 7 S. WYETH MCADAM Of Counsel 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED: 10 11 CARL W. HOFFMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 DATED: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2- November 1, 2018

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?