Froby v. Berryhill
Filing
18
ORDER granting 17 Motion to Extend Time. Motion due by 12/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:18-cv-00641-JAD-CWH Document 17 Filed 10/31/18 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DAYLE ELIESON
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
ELIZABETH FIRER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415-977-8937
Email: Elizabeth.Firer@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA (LAS VEGAS)
WILLIAM J. FROBY,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
v.
NANCY BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
) Case No. 2:18-cv-00641-JAD-CWH
)
)
)
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
)
EXTENSION OF TIME
)
(FIRST REQUEST)
)
)
)
)
16
17
Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) respectfully
18
requests for the first time that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Cross-Motion for
19
Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, due on November 8, 2018, by 30 days, through and
20
including December 10, 2018.
21
An extension of time is needed in order to prepare Defendant’s brief because of the caseload of
22
Defendant’s attorneys. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the
23
proceedings.
24
25
Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel on October 31, 2018. Plaintiff’s
counsel does not oppose this motion.
26
-1-
Case 2:18-cv-00641-JAD-CWH Document 17 Filed 10/31/18 Page 2 of 2
1
Respectfully submitted this 31st day of October 2018.
2
DAYLE ELIESON
United States Attorney
3
/s/ Elizabeth Firer
ELIZABETH FIRER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
4
5
6
7
S. WYETH MCADAM
Of Counsel
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED:
10
11
CARL W. HOFFMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
DATED:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
November 1, 2018
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?