Roberts v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 26

ORDER that no later than 10/19/2018 LVMPD shall file a waiver of service with respect to Officers LeBlanc and Lilienthal and their response to the amended complaint shall be filed by 11/2/2018. The United States Marshal Service shall refrain from attempting physical service on Officers LeBlanc and Lilienthal. Plaintiff must still provide the USM 285 form for Officer Devore and the United States Marshal Service shall proceed with attempting service on Officer Devore at his last-known address identified in Docket No. 25 once that USM 285 form has been provided by Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/15/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - Order and 25 placed in USM box - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 JOSHUA ROBERTS, Case No.: 2:18-cv-00649-APG-NJK 11 Plaintiff(s), Order 12 v. 13 14 15 16 LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendant(s). On September 27, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint 17 naming Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) Officers Devore, LeBlanc, and 18 Lilienthal explicitly as Defendants. Docket No. 16. As part of that order, the Court directed the 19 already-appearing Defendants, including LVMPD, to indicate whether they would accept service 20 on these officers’ behalf. Id. at 4. LVMPD declined to accept service. See Docket No. 20. 21 Given LVMPD’s refusal to accept service and Plaintiff’s pauper status, personal service 22 would then be completed on these officers personally by the United States Marshal Service. See 23 Docket No. 23. To enable that personal service, the Court ordered that these officers’ home 24 addresses be filed under seal. Id. LVMPD has refused to provide those addresses for Officers 25 LeBlanc and Lilienthal, however, and instead reversed course to indicate that LVMPD would now 26 accept service on their behalf through physical service at LVMPD headquarters on the Risk 27 Management Department. See Docket No. 25 at 5. 28 1 1 Given that LVMPD has now indicated that it will accept service on behalf of Officers 2 LeBlanc and Lilienthal, the Court fails to discern why physical service by the Marshal Service at 3 LVMPD headquarters is required rather than LVMPD filing a waiver of service pursuant to Rule 4 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Cf. Picozzi v. Clark Cty. Det. Cntr., 2017 U.S. Dist. 5 Lexis 171264, at *6 (D. Nev. Oct. 16, 2017) (Leen, J.) (declining to order additional physical 6 service attempt on retired LVMPD officer, and instead ordering LVMPD to file a waiver of 7 service). Indeed, requiring substituted physical service on LVMPD when LVMPD is already 8 participating in this case is contrary to LVMPD’s overarching duty to strive for the just, speedy, 9 and inexpensive determination of proceedings, Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, and is contrary to LVMPD’s 10 more particular “duty to avoid unnecessary expenses of serving the summons,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 4(d)(1). 12 Accordingly, no later than October 19, 2018, LVMPD is ORDERED to file a waiver of 13 service with respect to Officers LeBlanc and Lilienthal, and their response to the amended 14 complaint shall be filed by November 2, 2018. The Court INSTRUCTS that, even if Plaintiff 15 provides a USM 285 form for Officers LeBlanc and Lilienthal pursuant to the Court’s previous 16 order, the United States Marshal Service shall refrain from attempting physical service on them. 17 To be clear, nothing herein impacts the required service on Officer Devore. Plaintiff must 18 still provide the USM 285 form for Officer Devore and the United States Marshal Service shall 19 proceed with attempting service on Officer Devore at his last-known address identified in Docket 20 No. 25 once that USM 285 form has been provided by Plaintiff. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: October 15, 2018 ______________________________ Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge 23 24 25 26 cc: United States Marshal Service 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?