X-Trementerprise v. Shenzhen ImagineVision Technology Limited

Filing 25

ORDER Granting 24 Stipulation to Continue Hearing re 23 Order (First Request). Hearing re 22 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order reset for 9/26/2018 at 01:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MARK G. TRATOS, ESQ. (NV BAR NO. 1086)
[e-mail]
DONALD L. PRUNTY, ESQ. (NV BAR NO. 8230)
[e-mail]
SHAUNA L. NORTON, ESQ. (NV BAR NO. 11320)
[e-mail]
BETHANY L. RABE, ESQ. (NV BAR NO. 11691)
[e-mail]
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 400 North
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 North
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12

X-TREMENTERPRISE, a foreign corporation;
XSORIES HONG KONG LIMITED, a foreign
corporation,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16
17
18

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE HEARING

v.
SHENZHEN IMAGINEVISION
TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, a foreign entity;
IMAGINE VISION TECHNOLOGY (HONG
KONG) LIMITED, a foreign entity; ZHANG
FAN aka JASON FAN, an individual; KINSON
LOO, and individual; XIAMEN MEITU
MOBILE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a
foreign entity,

19

Defendants.

20
21

Case No.: 2:18-cv-00650-JAD-VCF

AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM

22
23

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties,

24

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant X-Trementerprise and Plaintiff Xsories Hong Kong Limited (together

25

“Plaintiffs”) by and through their undersigned counsel of record, and Defendant/Counter-claimant,

26

Shenzhen Imaginevision Technology Limited (“Defendant”) (collectively the “parties”) as follows:

27
28

1.

The parties filed their proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order on August 28,

2018 [ECF No. 22].
LV 421194374v2

Page 1 of 3

1

2.

On August 28, 2018, the Court issued an Order setting a hearing on the proposed

2

Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order to occur on September 7, 2018 in Courtroom D at 1:00 p.m.

3

[EC No. 23].

4

7.

An irreconcilable scheduling conflict has arising for counsel for Plaintiffs for the

5

current hearing date on the proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The parties conferred

6

regarding the conflict and are agreeable to continuing the hearing to a mutually agreeable date. As a

7

result of those discussions, the parties respectfully request that the hearing on the proposed

8

Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order be continued to either September 24, 2018, September 26,

9

2018 or September 27, 2018.

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 North
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12

8.

This request is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay.

Respectfully Submitted,
DATED this 5th day of September, 2018.

DATED this 5th day of September, 2018.

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

HOWARD & HOWARD
/s/ W. West Allen
W. West Allen (Bar No. 5566)
Jonathan W. Fountain (Bar No. 10531)
Jason P Weiland (Bar No. 12127)
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Suite 1000
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

20

/s/_Shauna L. Norton
Mark Tratos, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 1086
Donald L. Prunty, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8230
Shauna L. Norton, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11320
Bethany L. Rabe, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11691
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 N
Las Vegas, NV 89169

21

Counsel for Plaintiffs

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

22
23
24
25

Counsel for Shenzhen Imaginevision Technology
Limited

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the current hearing scheduled for September 7, 2018 at
1:00 p.m. on the proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order be vacated and rescheduled for
p
September 26
1
___________, 2018 at __:00 _.m. Courtroom 3D.

26

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
September 6, 2018
DATED:__________________________

27
28
LV 421194374v2

Page 2 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1
2

I hereby certify that on the 5th day of September, 2018, a true and correct copy of the

3

foregoing STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING Order

4

was filed electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Notice of filing will be served on all

5

parties by operation of the Court’s CM/ECF system and parties may access this filing through the

6

Court’s CM/ECF system.

7

_/s/___Cynthia L. Ney______________
An Employee of Greenberg Traurig, LLP

8
9

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
3773 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 400 North
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LV 421194374v2

Page 3 of 3