Richard et al v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al

Filing 16

ORDER Granting 15 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 13 Motion to Dismiss (First Request). IT IS ORDERED that the deadline for plaintiff to respond to 13 Trans Union LLC's motion to dismiss is EXTENDED to 7/26/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 Phone: (702) 825-6060 FAX: (702) 447-8048 Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Sean N. Payne, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13216 PAYNE LAW FIRM LLC 9550 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 253-A213 Las Vegas, NV 89123 Phone: (702) 952-2733 FAX: (702) 462-7227 Email: seanpayne@spaynelaw.com David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350 Henderson, NV 89123 Phone: (702) 880-5554 FAX: (702) 385-5518 Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 19 20 21 KIMBERLY J. RICHARD and JEFFREY L. RICHARD, Plaintiffs, 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, and TRANS UNION LLC, Defendants. Case No. 2:18-cv-00665-JAD-PAL ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [FIRST REQUEST] [ECF No. 15] 1 Plaintiffs Kimberly J. Richard and Jeffrey L. Richard (“Plaintiffs”) and Trans Union, LLC 2 (“Trans Union”), by and through their counsel of record, have agreed to stipulated to the following: 3 1. On April 13, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint. (ECF No. 1) 4 2. On June 28, 2018, Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint. 5 (ECF No. 13). 6 3. Plaintiffs’ response is due July 12, 2018. 7 4. Plaintiffs and Trans Union have agreed to extend Plaintiffs' response deadline 8 fourteen (14) days in order to allow the parties to discuss possible resolution of Plaintiffs’ claims 9 against Trans Union. As a result, Plaintiffs and Trans Union hereby request this Court to 10 extend the date for Plaintiffs to respond to Trans Union’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint 11 through and including July 26, 2018. 12 /// 13 /// 14 /// 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 This is the first request for an extension of this deadline, and is not made for purposes of delay. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated July 11, 2018 /s/ Sean N. Payne Sean N. Payne, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13216 PAYNE LAW FIRM LLC 9550 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 253-A213 Las Vegas, NV 89123 /s/ Jason G. Revzin Jason G. Revzin, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8629 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Matthew I. Knepper, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12796 Miles N. Clark, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13848 KNEPPER & CLARK LLC 10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109 Las Vegas, NV 89129 Attorneys for Defendant Trans Union LLC David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350 Henderson, Nevada 89123 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 20 21 22 Local Rule 7-1(c) states that "A stipulation that has been signed by fewer than all the parties or their attorneys will be treated---and must be filed---as a joint motion." This stipulation [ECF No. 15] is between the plaintiff and only one of the three defendants in this case. Accordingly, I treat it a joint motion under LR 7-1(c), find good cause, and GRANT it. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as that the deadline for plaintiff to respond to Trans Union LLC's motion to dismiss [ECF No. 13] is EXTENDED to July 26, 2018. Dated: July 12, 2018 23 24 U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey 25 26 27 28 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?