Richard et al v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 13 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 8/9/2018. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
10040 W. Cheyenne Ave., Suite 170-109
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Phone: (702) 825-6060
FAX: (702) 447-8048
Email: matthew.knepper@knepperclark.com
Email: miles.clark@knepperclark.com
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Sean N. Payne, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13216
PAYNE LAW FIRM LLC
9550 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 253-A213
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Phone: (702) 952-2733
FAX: (702) 462-7227
Email: seanpayne@spaynelaw.com
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 350
Henderson, NV 89123
Phone: (702) 880-5554
FAX: (702) 385-5518
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
19
20
21
KIMBERLY J. RICHARD and JEFFREY L.
RICHARD,
Plaintiffs,
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
v.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES, LLC, and TRANS UNION LLC,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:18-cv-00665-JAD-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
[SECOND REQUEST]
1
Plaintiffs Kimberly J. Richard and Jeffrey L. Richard (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Trans
2
Union LLC (“Trans Union”), Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), and Equifax
3
Information Services, LLC (“Equifax”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel
4
of record, have agreed to stipulate to the following:
5
1.
On April 13, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint. (ECF No. 1)
6
2.
On June 28, 2018, Trans Union filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
7
(ECF No. 13).
8
9
10
3.
On July 11, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a first request for an extension of time to respond
to Trans Union’s Motion to Dismiss through July 26, 2018 (ECF No. 15), which was granted by
the Court through its Order entered July 12, 2018. (ECF No. 16).
11
4.
Plaintiffs and Trans Union are continuing to work in good faith towards a potential
12
settlement, and in order to facilitate the continuance of these discussions, the Parties have agreed
13
to an additional fourteen (14) day extension of Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Trans Union’s
14
Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, the Parties hereby request the Court to further extend the date for
15
Plaintiffs to respond to Trans Union’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint through and
16
including August 9, 2018.
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
This is the second request for an extension of this deadline, and is not made for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated July 25, 2018
/s/ Sean N. Payne
Sean N. Payne, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13216
PAYNE LAW FIRM LLC
Matthew I. Knepper, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12796
Miles N. Clark, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13848
KNEPPER & CLARK LLC
/s/ Jason G. Revzin
Jason G. Revzin, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8629
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorneys for Defendant
Trans Union LLC
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
/s/ Bradley T. Austin
Bradley T. Austin, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13064
SNELL & WILMER LLP
3883 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Defendant
Equifax Information Services LLC
/s/ Andrew J. Sharples
Jennifer L Braster, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9982
Andrew J. Sharples, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12866
NAYLOR & BRASTER
1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Attorneys for Defendant Experian Information
Solutions, Inc.
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 26, 2018._____
Dated: __________,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?