Davis v. Unitel Voice, LLC et al

Filing 31

ORDER Granting 30 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 26 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 10/2/2018. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:18-cv-00673-JCM-PAL Document 30 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 3

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COI]RT

2

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

a

J

4

Case

No.:

2:18-CV-00673-JCM-PAL

STEVEN R. DAVIS, an individual,

vs.

6

7

STTPULATTON AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO
DISMISS TINDER FED. R. CIV. P.
t2(b)Q) FrLED SEPTEMBER 4,
2018 (ECF No.26).

Plaintiffs,

5

UMTEL VOICE, LLC,

et al

Defendants.

8

(First Request)

9
10

STTPULATTON AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSTON OF TrME
TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS UI\DER
FED. R. CIV. P. t2(b)(2) FILED SEPTEMBER 4,2018 (ECF No. 26).

11

12

(First Request)
13

Plaintiff Steven R. Davis, pro se, and Telecom Management Group, Inc., an Illinois

l4
corporation doing business as Unitel, sued as Unitel Voice, LLC, dlbla Telecom Management
15
1
Group, Inc. (the "Defendant"), through its undersigned counsel of record, agree that upon the

t6
Court's approval, Plaintiff's response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26), currently
17

due on September

1

8, 2018, shall be due two weeks from that date, on October 2, 2018, for the

18

reasons set forth below:

t9

l.

Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26) was timely filed on September 4,

20
201 8.

21

22

/.)
24

)5

t

Telecom Management Group, Inc., an Illinois corporation d/b/a Unitel maintains that it has been
sued in effor as Unitel Voice, LLC dlblaTelecom Management Group, Inc., as stated in its Motion
to Dismiss (ECF No. 26 at I n. 1); Plaintiffdoes not agree with Defendant's position.
Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss
Page 1 of3

Case 2:18-cv-00673-JCM-PAL Document 30 Filed 09/17/18 Page 2 of 3

2.

1

2

2,2018, to file his response.

3.

a

J

4

Plaintiff, via email on Septernber 10, 2018, has requested an Extension to October

Plaintiffispro se and asserts that he has limited

access to legal resources and

needs the additional time to craft his response.

5

4.

Counsel for Defendant communicated Defendailt's assentto this extension.

6

5.

Accordingly, Plaintiffand Defendant agree that upon the Court's approval,

7

Plaintiff

6.

8

9

7.

Furthermore, upon receipt of Plaintiffs response, the Defendant shall have seven

This Stipulation has been entered before Plaintiffs response to Defendant's

Motion to Dismiss is due to the Court.

8.

12

t3

Motion to Dismiss shall be due on or before October 2,2018.

days to reply.

10
11

s response to Defondant's

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, this is Plaintiffand Defendant's first request for an

extension of this deadline.

l4

9.

The parties seek this extension in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

15

10.

No party would be prejudiced by the granting of this stipulated motion for an

16

extension of time.

t7
18

t/

t9
20

il

2l
22
23

24

)5

Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss
Page 2

of3

Case 2:18-cv-00673-JCM-PAL Document 30 Filed 09/17/18 Page 3 of 3

undersi gned

Plaintiff

an

d coun sel

2
3

4
egas,

NV 89

6

(786) 753-r93t
[e-mail]

7

/s/ J. Malcolm DeVov

8

J. Malcolm DeVoy (Nevada Bar No. 1 1950)
Erica Bobak (i.{evada Bar No. 13828)

9
10
11

t2

DeVoy Law P.C.
2575 Montessouri Street, Suite 201
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
702-7A6-305t
702-977-9359 (fax)
ecf(@devoylaw.com
Auorneys for Defendant
Telecom Management Group Inc, dlb/a Unitel

11

IJ

ORDER

t4
For good cause appearing, the foregoing stipulation is GRANTED and it is ORDERED
15

that Plaintif?s opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26) shall be due on or before
16

October 2,2018, and Plaintiff

s

reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss seven days after Plaintiff

t7
serving his opposition to that motion.
18

September 18,
Dated this _
day of

2018.

201 8.

19

20

2l

TINITED STATES DISTRICT JTIDGE

22
Z3

24

)5

Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss
Page 3

of3