Davis v. Unitel Voice, LLC et al

Filing 50

ORDER Granting 49 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 43 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 1/11/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:18-cv-00673-JCM-PAL Document 49 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 3

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5
6
7

Case No.: 2:18-CV-00673-JCM-PAL
STEVEN R. DAVIS, an individual,
Plaintiffs,

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT CENTURY LINK,
INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(2)
FILED NOVEMBER 20th, 2018.

vs.
UNITEL VOICE, LLC, et al

8

Defendants.
(First Request)

9
10

Plaintiff Steven R. Davis, pro se, and Century Link, Inc.’s through its undersigned

11

counsel of record, agree that upon the Court’s approval, Plaintiff’s response to Defendant

12

Century Link Inc.’s1 Motion to Dismiss, currently due on DECEMBER 4TH, 2018 shall be due

13

30 DAYS from that date, on JANUARY 4TH, 2019 for the reasons set forth below:

14

1. Defendant Century Link Inc’s Motion to Dismiss was filed on November 20th,

15
16

2018.
2. Plaintiff, via email has requested an Extension to January 4th, 2019, to file his

17
18

response.
3. Plaintiff is pro se and has limited access to legal resources and needs the

19
20

additional time to craft his response.
4.

Attorney Lauren D. Calvert communicated her assent.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss
Page 1 of 3

Case 2:18-cv-00673-JCM-PAL Document 49 Filed 11/28/18 Page 2 of 3

1

5. Accordingly, Plaintiff and Defendant, Century Link, Inc. agree that, upon the

2

Court’s approval, Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss shall

3

be due on or before January 11th, 2019.

4
5

6. Furthermore, upon receipt of Plaintiff’s response, the Defendant Century Link,
Inc. shall have seven days to reply.

6

7. This Stipulation has been entered before the Motion is otherwise due.

7

8. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, this is Plaintiff and Defendant’s first request for an

8
9
10
11
12
13

extension of this deadline.
9. The parties seek this extension in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
10. No party would be prejudiced by the granting of this stipulated motion for an
extension of time.
Dated, this the 28th day of November 2018, by the undersigned Plaintiff and
counsel for Defendant, Century Link, Inc.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

/s/ Steve R. Davis
_____________________________________
Steve R. Davis, Pro Per
4038 Velarde Ct.
Las Vegas, NV 89120
[phone]
[e-mail]

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss
Page 2 of 3

Case 2:18-cv-00673-JCM-PAL Document 49 Filed 11/28/18 Page 3 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

/s/ Lauren Calvert, Esq.
_____________________________________
/s/ M. CALEB MEYER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13379
LAUREN CALVERT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10534
MESSNER REEVES, LLP
8945 West Russell Road, suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702-363-5101
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant, Century Link, Inc.

8
9
10
11
12

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 3, 2018.

, 2018

13
14

_____________________________________
U.S. District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss
Page 3 of 3