Williams v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.

Filing 18

ORDER Granting 17 First Stipulation to Extend Discovery. Discovery due by 12/4/2018. Motions due by 1/3/2019. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00679-RFB-GWF Document 17 Filed 08/28/18 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6069 S. Fort Apache Rd., Ste 100 Las Vegas, NV 89148 11 Michael Kind, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13903 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6069 S. Fort Apache Rd., Ste. 100 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Phone: (800) 400-6808 x7 mkind@kazlg.com David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350 Henderson, Nevada 89123 Phone: (702) 880-5554 dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Dewann Williams 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 15 Dewann Williams, 16 17 18 Case No.: 2:18-cv-00679-RFB-GWF Plaintiff, v. JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY Santander Consumer USA, Inc., (FIRST REQUEST) 19 20 Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff Dewann Williams (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Santander Consumer USA, Inc. (“Defendant”) (jointly as “the Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, do hereby stipulate to modify the Court’s Order, ECF No. 10, to extend (1) the last date to disclose experts from September 5, 2018 to October 5, 2018; 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY !1 CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00679-RFB-GWF Case 2:18-cv-00679-RFB-GWF Document 17 Filed 08/28/18 Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (2) the last date to disclose rebuttal experts from October 5, 2018 to November 4, 2018; (3) the last date to complete discovery from November 4, 2018, to December 4, 2018; (4) the last date to file dispositive motions from December 4, 2018, to January 3, 2019; and (5) (3) the last date to file the proposed joint pretrial order from January 3, 2018, to February 5, 2019. 9 Pursuant to LR 26-4, good cause exists to amend the Scheduling Order. The 10 Parties have diligently pursued discovery. Plaintiff has propounded written 11 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6069 S. Fort Apache Rd., Ste 100 Las Vegas, NV 89148 8 discovery requests and noticed Defendant’s deposition. The Parties are meeting and 12 conferring regarding Defendant’s discovery responses. This request for extension of 13 deadlines is made specifically in this fee-shifting matter since experts and 14 depositions are a significant expense. The Parties seek additional time to disclose 15 experts until the discovery disputes are resolved and to reschedule Defendant’s 16 deposition, because of scheduling conflicts. 17 18 Further good cause exists to amend the Scheduling Order to provide additional time to complete ongoing settlement discussions. 19 Pursuant to LR 26-4(a), Plaintiff propounded written discovery requests upon 20 Defendant and noticed the deposition of Defendant. Defendant served Plaintiffs 21 with objections to Plaintiffs’ written discovery requests. 22 23 Pursuant to LR 26-4(b), the Parties request additional time to conduct Plaintiffs’ deposition of Defendant and to disclose experts. 24 Pursuant to LR 26-4(c), this request for extension of deadlines is made 25 specifically in this fee-shifting matter since experts and deposition is a significant 26 expense. 27 28 Pursuant to LR 26-4(d), the Parties propose the following discovery schedule: (1) last date to disclose experts: October 5, 2018; ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY !2 CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00679-RFB-GWF Case 2:18-cv-00679-RFB-GWF Document 17 Filed 08/28/18 Page 3 of 5 1 (2) last date to disclose rebuttal experts: November 4, 2018; 2 (3) last date to complete discovery: December 4, 2018; 3 (4) last date to file dispositive motions: January 3, 2019; and 4 (5) last date to file the proposed joint pretrial order: February 5, 2019. For the foregoing reasons, the Parties jointly request that this Court modify its 6 May 31, 2018, Order to provide an additional 30 days to complete discovery, and 7 the in the ordinary course file dispositive motions, and the proposed joint pretrial 8 order as described in the proposed timeline above. 9 /// 10 /// 11 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6069 S. Fort Apache Rd., Ste 100 Las Vegas, NV 89148 5 /// 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY !3 CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00679-RFB-GWF Case 2:18-cv-00679-RFB-GWF Document 17 Filed 08/28/18 Page 4 of 5 1 2 This is the Parties’ first request for an extension of these deadlines. DATED this 28th day of August 2018. 3 4 5 6 7 8 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC By: /s/ Michael Kind Michael Kind, Esq. 6069 S. Fort Apache Rd., Ste 100 Las Vegas, NV 89148 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 10 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6069 S. Fort Apache Rd., Ste 100 Las Vegas, NV 89148 11 12 13 14 TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP By: /s/ Virginia Bell Flynn Virginia Bell Flynn, Esq. Chad R. Fuller, Esq. 1001 Haxall Point Richmond, VA 23219 ORDER 15 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order, ECF No 10, is modified to extend 17 the discovery deadlines as follows: 18 (1) last date to disclose experts: October 5, 2018; 19 (2) last date to disclose rebuttal experts: November 4, 2018; 20 (3) last date to complete discovery: December 4, 2018; 21 (4) last date to file dispositive motions: January 3, 2019; and 22 (5) last date to file the proposed joint pretrial order: February 5, 2019. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 8/29/2018 Dated: ______________________________
 28 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY !4 CASE NO. 2:18-CV-00679-RFB-GWF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?